Local democratic resistance to autocratisation: evidence from Budapest, Banja Luka, and Zagreb

Local opposition forces often win local elections in key cities in autocratising countries. However, we still know too little about the interplay between local and national regime developments. The paper unpacks these subnational processes, with new evidence from three case studies in Southeastern and Central Europe: Budapest, Banja Luka, and Zagreb. We systematise a corpus of 26 semi-structured interviews with local experts, activists, and politicians to examine how city-based oppositions can resist autocratisation through three strategies: building coalitions and leaderships, leveraging local institutions, and enhancing media presence and alternative rhetoric. We also examine the incumbent’s response to such local democratic resistance. Our findings illustrate that, even though autocratising agents in the central government retain important levers of power that could limit opposition spillovers, such victories in large cities can provide opposition actors with new channels of resistance from below that could help contain autocratisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Politics
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2024.2425457
Citations
8
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local democratic resistance to autocratisation: evidence from Budapest, Banja Luka, and Zagreb

Guido Panzano, Venelin Bochev, Simone Benazzo
8 citations
Contemporary Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
17.85
article

Local democratic resistance to autocratisation: evidence from Budapest, Banja Luka, and Zagreb

Guido Panzano, Venelin Bochev, Simone Benazzo
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Local opposition forces often win local elections in key cities in autocratising countries. However, we still know too little about the interplay between local and national regime developments. The paper unpacks these subnational processes, with new evidence from three case studies in Southeastern and Central Europe: Budapest, Banja Luka, and Zagreb. We systematise a corpus of 26 semi-structured interviews with local experts, activists, and politicians to examine how city-based oppositions can resist autocratisation through three strategies: building coalitions and leaderships, leveraging local institutions, and enhancing media presence and alternative rhetoric. We also examine the incumbent’s response to such local democratic resistance. Our findings illustrate that, even though autocratising agents in the central government retain important levers of power that could limit opposition spillovers, such victories in large cities can provide opposition actors with new channels of resistance from below that could help contain autocratisation.

Contemporary PoliticsVol. 31(4)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
European Union Policy and Governance
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.