A study on the Sasaki–Sebata controversy:

This study aimed to examine the Sasaki-Sebata controversy between Kentaro Sasaki and Shiro Sebata, said to have been the first postwar dispute regarding the practice of physical education.Previous studies have examined mainly the practices of Sasaki and Sebata as well as the differences between them, but in terms of actual historical proof, the positioning of the 2 has been quite ambiguous.By contrast, the present study examined the essence of physical education as considered by Sasaki and Sebata from a historical perspective and sought to clarify their fundamental differences.According to Sasaki, the purpose of physical education was labor, whereas Sebata considered that physical education facilitated a physically active lifestyle separate from labor.Despite this difference, when exploring the practices of the 2, it was found that both had similarly placed value in the aim of breaking away from alienated physical education and maintaining ties with society by fostering the development of children who would be able to change it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport Sciences)
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.002-24047
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A study on the Sasaki–Sebata controversy:

Tomomi ISHIDA
Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport Sciences)
Archaeology and Historical Studies
article

A study on the Sasaki–Sebata controversy:

Tomomi ISHIDA
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the Sasaki-Sebata controversy between Kentaro Sasaki and Shiro Sebata, said to have been the first postwar dispute regarding the practice of physical education.Previous studies have examined mainly the practices of Sasaki and Sebata as well as the differences between them, but in terms of actual historical proof, the positioning of the 2 has been quite ambiguous.By contrast, the present study examined the essence of physical education as considered by Sasaki and Sebata from a historical perspective and sought to clarify their fundamental differences.According to Sasaki, the purpose of physical education was labor, whereas Sebata considered that physical education facilitated a physically active lifestyle separate from labor.Despite this difference, when exploring the practices of the 2, it was found that both had similarly placed value in the aim of breaking away from alienated physical education and maintaining ties with society by fostering the development of children who would be able to change it.

Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport Sciences)Vol. 70(0)
Ritsumeikan University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Archaeology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A study on the Sasaki–Sebata controversy: — Tomomi ISHIDA · Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education Health and Sport Sciences) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS