Rewiring Ethics: Collective Action, Recognition, and Fractal Responsibility

Many moral theories hold individuals responsible for their marginal impact on massive patterns (for instance overall value or equality of opportunity) or for following whichever rules would realise that pattern on the whole. But each of these injunctions is problematic. Intuitively, the first gives individuals responsibility for too much, the second for too little. This article offers a new approach to ethics in collective action contexts. It defends a new collaborative principle that assigns recognisably worthwhile responsibilities to agencies wherever possible. This principle supports a fractal model of moral responsibility, that favours restructuring divisions of labour to enhance the prospects of recognition at every level of social organisation. This article is programmatic: starting from a conjecture about the moral significance of recognition, it sketches a new way of approaching a range of collective action problems that combines the importance of the perspectives of both moral and political philosophy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Philosophy
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.16995/pp.17076
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rewiring Ethics: Collective Action, Recognition, and Fractal Responsibility

1 citations
Political Philosophy
Intellectual Property Law
4.07
article

Rewiring Ethics: Collective Action, Recognition, and Fractal Responsibility

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Many moral theories hold individuals responsible for their marginal impact on massive patterns (for instance overall value or equality of opportunity) or for following whichever rules would realise that pattern on the whole. But each of these injunctions is problematic. Intuitively, the first gives individuals responsibility for too much, the second for too little. This article offers a new approach to ethics in collective action contexts. It defends a new collaborative principle that assigns recognisably worthwhile responsibilities to agencies wherever possible. This principle supports a fractal model of moral responsibility, that favours restructuring divisions of labour to enhance the prospects of recognition at every level of social organisation. This article is programmatic: starting from a conjecture about the moral significance of recognition, it sketches a new way of approaching a range of collective action problems that combines the importance of the perspectives of both moral and political philosophy.

Political PhilosophyVol. -2(1)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intellectual Property Law
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.