Speech Emotional Recognition of Telephone Conversation by Using Deep Learning

In this research, we have compare two clustering algorithms, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to support the SER model for voice communication. We proposed an approach to speech emotion recognition in telephone conversations using a combination of Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) for audio feature extraction. Only the zeroth coefficient (energy) of MFCC will be used, as energy can provide a good representation for sound. The extracted results are then classified using CNN and RNN. The CNN algorithm consistently achieved a higher accuracy than RNN with the values of 0.93 at epoch=50, 0.93 at epoch=100, 0.90 at epoch=150, and 0.93 at epoch=200. But the RNN algorithm has a faster training times than CNN. For optimizer test, Adam optimizer performs well for both models with respective accuracy values of 0.93 and 0.94, outperforming other optimizers for accuracy.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Computer Science
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33022/ijcs.v13i6.4442
Primary Topic
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speech Emotional Recognition of Telephone Conversation by Using Deep Learning

Indonesian Journal of Computer Science
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
article

Speech Emotional Recognition of Telephone Conversation by Using Deep Learning

article en

Abstract

In this research, we have compare two clustering algorithms, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to support the SER model for voice communication. We proposed an approach to speech emotion recognition in telephone conversations using a combination of Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) for audio feature extraction. Only the zeroth coefficient (energy) of MFCC will be used, as energy can provide a good representation for sound. The extracted results are then classified using CNN and RNN. The CNN algorithm consistently achieved a higher accuracy than RNN with the values of 0.93 at epoch=50, 0.93 at epoch=100, 0.90 at epoch=150, and 0.93 at epoch=200. But the RNN algorithm has a faster training times than CNN. For optimizer test, Adam optimizer performs well for both models with respective accuracy values of 0.93 and 0.94, outperforming other optimizers for accuracy.

Indonesian Journal of Computer ScienceVol. 13(6)
Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Speech Recognition and Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.