Geostrategic globalization: US–China rivalry, corporate strategy, and the new global economy

Geopolitical rivalry has intensified to a degree not seen since the Cold War. The US and China have embraced interventionist state-capitalist practices in competing attempts to gain control over the transnational networks that underpin globalization. As a result, multinational corporations (MNCs) are exposed to unprecedented levels of geopolitical risk. Most MNCs are responding in one of two ways. Some hedge and try to remain aloof from the US–China rivalry, while others align with the geostrategic objective of states in order to secure patronage (e.g. subsidies and public contracts). If MNCs maintain global production networks bridging the US–China divide they will attenuate the fragmentation of the global economy. Alternatively, if MNCs align with states’ geostrategic objectives, they will accelerate economic fragmentation. We conclude that this emergent meta-context and MNC risk mitigation strategies are shaping what we refer to as geostrategic globalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Globalizations
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2024.2434306
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geostrategic globalization: US–China rivalry, corporate strategy, and the new global economy

Steve Rolf, Seth Schindler
13 citations
Globalizations
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
29.01
article

Geostrategic globalization: US–China rivalry, corporate strategy, and the new global economy

Steve Rolf, Seth Schindler
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Geopolitical rivalry has intensified to a degree not seen since the Cold War. The US and China have embraced interventionist state-capitalist practices in competing attempts to gain control over the transnational networks that underpin globalization. As a result, multinational corporations (MNCs) are exposed to unprecedented levels of geopolitical risk. Most MNCs are responding in one of two ways. Some hedge and try to remain aloof from the US–China rivalry, while others align with the geostrategic objective of states in order to secure patronage (e.g. subsidies and public contracts). If MNCs maintain global production networks bridging the US–China divide they will attenuate the fragmentation of the global economy. Alternatively, if MNCs align with states’ geostrategic objectives, they will accelerate economic fragmentation. We conclude that this emergent meta-context and MNC risk mitigation strategies are shaping what we refer to as geostrategic globalization.

GlobalizationsVol. 22(6)
Center for Global Development (US), University of Sussex (GB), University of Manchester (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Asian Industrial and Economic Development
29.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Geostrategic globalization: US–China rivalry, corporate strategy, and the new global economy — Steve Rolf, Seth Schindler · Globalizations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS