De-tracking at the margin: How alternative secondary education pathways affect student attainment
This paper estimates how marginal increases in the flexibility of between-school tracking affect student attainment by exploiting the addition of non-selective ‘comprehensive schools’ and hybrid ‘vocational high schools’ to Germany’s tracked school system. These schools opened up alternative pathways to the university-entrance certificate, which traditionally could only be obtained at academic-track schools. We use administrative records to compile a county-level panel of school supply and attainment for 13 cohorts between 1995 and 2007. Cross-sectionally, the supplies of all three school types awarding the university-entrance certificate correlate positively with its attainment. However, for academic-track and comprehensive schools this association is not robust to the inclusion of regional controls, suggesting that it reflects regional differences in educational demand rather than supply-side effects. For vocational high schools, in contrast, we find robust evidence for positive attainment effects not only in cross-sectional and two-way fixed-effects panel regressions, but also in an event-study design that exploits the quasi-random timing of new school openings. Likely reasons for their success are that they lower the (perceived) costs of educational upgrading for late-bloomers, and their hybrid curriculum, which may retain students in general schooling who would otherwise enter vocational training.
Authors
- Sönke Hendrik Matthewes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-7778)
- Camilla Borgna (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6929-185X)
Institutions
- Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB)
- University of Turin (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Economics of Education Review
- Published
- 2024-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102608
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- School Choice and Performance
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.29
Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Jacobs Foundation