What works for whom in which circumstances in successful HRM implementation? A realist synthesis

High-quality HR practices do not always yield positive outcomes due to implementation shortcomings, which has led to the shift in focus from the content of HR practices to their process of implementation. Despite this shift, there remains a lack of systematic understanding of how and why implementation of HR practices succeeds or fails. To address this gap, a comprehensive review of effective implementation mechanisms, influencing contextual factors, and resulting outcomes is needed. Consequently, this study adopts a realist synthesis approach following the RAMESES publication standards to identify and synthesise existing evidence from empirical studies of HRM implementation. Reviewing 62 articles, we extracted and proposed four realist programme theories based on the process mechanisms attributed to actors of line managers, employees, senior managers, and HR departments. These realist programme theories explain how the process mechanisms bring about different outcomes in different contexts, hence, they enhance the understanding of ‘what works for whom in which circumstances?’ regarding HRM implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115115
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What works for whom in which circumstances in successful HRM implementation? A realist synthesis

Hamid Roodbari, Chidiebere Ogbonnaya, Atieh S. Mirfakhar, Mireia Valverde et al.
4 citations
Journal of Business Research
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
4.52
article

What works for whom in which circumstances in successful HRM implementation? A realist synthesis

Hamid Roodbari, Chidiebere Ogbonnaya, Atieh S. Mirfakhar, Mireia Valverde, Jordi Trullén
article en
4 citations

Abstract

High-quality HR practices do not always yield positive outcomes due to implementation shortcomings, which has led to the shift in focus from the content of HR practices to their process of implementation. Despite this shift, there remains a lack of systematic understanding of how and why implementation of HR practices succeeds or fails. To address this gap, a comprehensive review of effective implementation mechanisms, influencing contextual factors, and resulting outcomes is needed. Consequently, this study adopts a realist synthesis approach following the RAMESES publication standards to identify and synthesise existing evidence from empirical studies of HRM implementation. Reviewing 62 articles, we extracted and proposed four realist programme theories based on the process mechanisms attributed to actors of line managers, employees, senior managers, and HR departments. These realist programme theories explain how the process mechanisms bring about different outcomes in different contexts, hence, they enhance the understanding of ‘what works for whom in which circumstances?’ regarding HRM implementation.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 188
Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (PT), Sharif University of Technology (IR), King's College London (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Universitat Ramon Llull (ES), Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
University of Oxford, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
4.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.