Evaluating the efficacy of protein quantification methods on membrane proteins

Protein quantification is an important tool for a wide range of biological applications. The most common methods include the Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and Coomassie Bradford assays. Despite their wide applicability, the mechanisms of action imply that these methods may not be ideal for large transmembrane proteins due to the proteins' integration in the plasma membrane. Here, we investigate this problem by assessing the efficacy and applicability of these three common protein quantification methods on a candidate transmembrane protein: Na, K-ATPase (NKA). We compared these methods with an ELISA, which we newly developed and describe here for the quantification of NKA. The use of a relative standard curve allows this ELISA to be easily adapted to other proteins and across the animal kingdom. Our results revealed that the three conventional methods significantly overestimate the concentration of NKA compared with the ELISA. This is due to the samples containing a heterogeneous mix of proteins, including a significant amount of non-target proteins. Further, by applying the protein concentrations determined by the different methods to <i>in vitro</i> assays, we found that variation in the resulting data was consistently low when the assay reactions were prepared based on concentrations determined from the ELISA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Biology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsob.240082
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the efficacy of protein quantification methods on membrane proteins

Shabnam Mohammadi, Susanne Dobler, Jana Löptien, Sidney Vesting
10 citations
Open Biology
Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
2.34
article

Evaluating the efficacy of protein quantification methods on membrane proteins

Shabnam Mohammadi, Susanne Dobler, Jana Löptien, Sidney Vesting
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Protein quantification is an important tool for a wide range of biological applications. The most common methods include the Lowry, bicinchoninic acid (BCA) and Coomassie Bradford assays. Despite their wide applicability, the mechanisms of action imply that these methods may not be ideal for large transmembrane proteins due to the proteins' integration in the plasma membrane. Here, we investigate this problem by assessing the efficacy and applicability of these three common protein quantification methods on a candidate transmembrane protein: Na, K-ATPase (NKA). We compared these methods with an ELISA, which we newly developed and describe here for the quantification of NKA. The use of a relative standard curve allows this ELISA to be easily adapted to other proteins and across the animal kingdom. Our results revealed that the three conventional methods significantly overestimate the concentration of NKA compared with the ELISA. This is due to the samples containing a heterogeneous mix of proteins, including a significant amount of non-target proteins. Further, by applying the protein concentrations determined by the different methods to <i>in vitro</i> assays, we found that variation in the resulting data was consistently low when the assay reactions were prepared based on concentrations determined from the ELISA.

Open BiologyVol. 14(12)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (DE), Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (ES)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
2.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.