The influence of core-build up materials on biaxial flexural strength of strength-gradient zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics: an in-vitro study

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using different core build-up materials on biaxial flexural strength (BFS) of multilayered strength-gradient zirconia ceramic in comparison to lithium disilicate ceramic. Thirty zirconia discs were fabricated from IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime (Zir), 30 discs from IPS e.max CAD (LS2), 30 composite discs were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram (TNC) and 30 from MultiCore Flow (MCF). The ceramic discs were adhesively cemented to composite discs forming 4 groups (n = 15) (Zir-MCF, Zir-TNC, LS2-MCF and LS2-TNC). BFS was determined using a piston-on-3-ball test. The data were statistically analyzed with independent t-tests for significant differences (p = 0.05). In zirconia groups, significantly higher stress values were recorded in the composite and the ceramic for Zir-TNC, compared to Zir-MCF (p < 0.001), while for LS2 groups, no significant differences were found between the 2 composites (p = 0.157) but stresses in LS2 were significantly higher for LS2-TNC than LS2-MCF (p < 0.001). Comparing the values between the ceramic groups, stresses were significantly higher for zirconia than LS2 (p < 0.001). It was concluded that the tested composite materials significantly differ in their strength, which also influenced the strength of the overlying ceramics, and that strength-gradient zirconia had higher strength than LS2. Monolithic strength-gradient zirconia restorations supported by composite core build-up materials with superior mechanical properties can be durable restorative options for high stress-bearing areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-82030-5
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of core-build up materials on biaxial flexural strength of strength-gradient zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics: an in-vitro study

Yara Oweis, Abedelmalek Kalefh Tabnjh, Nadia Ereifej, Motasum Abu‐Awwad et al.
2 citations
Scientific Reports
Dental materials and restorations
0.80
article

The influence of core-build up materials on biaxial flexural strength of strength-gradient zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics: an in-vitro study

Yara Oweis, Abedelmalek Kalefh Tabnjh, Nadia Ereifej, Motasum Abu‐Awwad, Dina B. Musa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of using different core build-up materials on biaxial flexural strength (BFS) of multilayered strength-gradient zirconia ceramic in comparison to lithium disilicate ceramic. Thirty zirconia discs were fabricated from IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime (Zir), 30 discs from IPS e.max CAD (LS2), 30 composite discs were prepared from Tetric N-Ceram (TNC) and 30 from MultiCore Flow (MCF). The ceramic discs were adhesively cemented to composite discs forming 4 groups (n = 15) (Zir-MCF, Zir-TNC, LS2-MCF and LS2-TNC). BFS was determined using a piston-on-3-ball test. The data were statistically analyzed with independent t-tests for significant differences (p = 0.05). In zirconia groups, significantly higher stress values were recorded in the composite and the ceramic for Zir-TNC, compared to Zir-MCF (p < 0.001), while for LS2 groups, no significant differences were found between the 2 composites (p = 0.157) but stresses in LS2 were significantly higher for LS2-TNC than LS2-MCF (p < 0.001). Comparing the values between the ceramic groups, stresses were significantly higher for zirconia than LS2 (p < 0.001). It was concluded that the tested composite materials significantly differ in their strength, which also influenced the strength of the overlying ceramics, and that strength-gradient zirconia had higher strength than LS2. Monolithic strength-gradient zirconia restorations supported by composite core build-up materials with superior mechanical properties can be durable restorative options for high stress-bearing areas.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of Jordan (JO), Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO), Jordan Hospital (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental materials and restorations
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.