Is a Consensus Possible between Geochemical and Geophysical Models of the Internal Structure of the Lunar Mantle?

Significant inconsistencies persist between geophysical and geochemical groups of lunar composition models, as well as within each group. The primary issues are related to the assessment of the content of main petrogenic elements (Fe, Mg, Si), including refractory elements (Al, Ca). In this study, we examined the impact of the chemical composition and mineralogy of different compositional models on the seismic and density structure of the lunar interior in combination with phase equilibrium calculations. Two groups of new geophysical models containing 51–52 wt % SiO2 are considered—conventionally Earth-like models with terrestrial Al2O3 content and Moon-like models with increased Al2O3 content, obtained on the basis of seismic and selenodesic constraints using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, as well as the most popular geochemical models TWM (Taylor, 1982) and LPUM (Longhi, 2006) with ∼45–46 wt % SiO2. For these geophysical and geochemical models, we explicitly calculated sound velocities and densities of mantle-phase assemblages for a range of proposed selenotherms and compared the results with high-quality Apollo seismic data (Garcia et al., 2019). Regardless of the abundance of refractory elements, we find very satisfactory agreement between the physical properties of our new geophysical models and the Apollo seismic data, confirming the enrichment of the lunar mantle in FeO (∼12 wt %) and SiO2 (∼50 wt %) at depths from 50 to 500 km. This enrichment of SiO2 corresponds to the predominance of pyroxenes, especially low-Ca orthopyroxene, over olivine. In contrast, sound velocities in silica-unsaturated, olivine-dominated compositions enriched (TWM) or depleted (LPUM) in FeO and Al2O3 are inconsistent with the Apollo lunar seismic data. The inferred compositions contain significantly more FeO and SiO2 than the bulk silicate Earth, which poses problems associated with the formation of the Moon from a pyrolite mantle during a giant impact scenario.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geochemistry International
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0016702924700836
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is a Consensus Possible between Geochemical and Geophysical Models of the Internal Structure of the Lunar Mantle?

Е. V. Kronrod, O. L. Kuskov, V. A. Kronrod, Koji Matsumoto
2 citations
Geochemistry International
Planetary Science and Exploration
0.66
article

Is a Consensus Possible between Geochemical and Geophysical Models of the Internal Structure of the Lunar Mantle?

Е. V. Kronrod, O. L. Kuskov, V. A. Kronrod, Koji Matsumoto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Significant inconsistencies persist between geophysical and geochemical groups of lunar composition models, as well as within each group. The primary issues are related to the assessment of the content of main petrogenic elements (Fe, Mg, Si), including refractory elements (Al, Ca). In this study, we examined the impact of the chemical composition and mineralogy of different compositional models on the seismic and density structure of the lunar interior in combination with phase equilibrium calculations. Two groups of new geophysical models containing 51–52 wt % SiO2 are considered—conventionally Earth-like models with terrestrial Al2O3 content and Moon-like models with increased Al2O3 content, obtained on the basis of seismic and selenodesic constraints using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, as well as the most popular geochemical models TWM (Taylor, 1982) and LPUM (Longhi, 2006) with ∼45–46 wt % SiO2. For these geophysical and geochemical models, we explicitly calculated sound velocities and densities of mantle-phase assemblages for a range of proposed selenotherms and compared the results with high-quality Apollo seismic data (Garcia et al., 2019). Regardless of the abundance of refractory elements, we find very satisfactory agreement between the physical properties of our new geophysical models and the Apollo seismic data, confirming the enrichment of the lunar mantle in FeO (∼12 wt %) and SiO2 (∼50 wt %) at depths from 50 to 500 km. This enrichment of SiO2 corresponds to the predominance of pyroxenes, especially low-Ca orthopyroxene, over olivine. In contrast, sound velocities in silica-unsaturated, olivine-dominated compositions enriched (TWM) or depleted (LPUM) in FeO and Al2O3 are inconsistent with the Apollo lunar seismic data. The inferred compositions contain significantly more FeO and SiO2 than the bulk silicate Earth, which poses problems associated with the formation of the Moon from a pyrolite mantle during a giant impact scenario.

Geochemistry InternationalVol. 63(2)
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP), National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (JP), V.I. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Planetary Science and Exploration
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.