Mitigation Techniques for Volumetric Locking in the Implicit Material Point Method (MPM)

ABSTRACT The material point method (MPM) aims to avoid mesh distortion problems occurring in the commonly used finite element method (FEM). To achieve this, the continuum is discretized as a set of material points, while the solution of the weak form of the underlying partial differential equations is conducted on an Eulerian background mesh. As this process works similar to FEM, the MPM also displays volumetric locking for near‐incompressible materials. However, this also means that mitigation techniques developed for FEM can be adapted to the MPM. The main difficulty for this process lies in the higher‐continuity basis functions, which are required in MPM to achieve reasonable results. This study first reviews the applicability of different locking mitigation techniques in MPM. Then, a framework for a locking‐free implicit MPM is presented and validated using common tests investigating the locking behavior and stress oscillations. Finally, the presented methods are applied to a viscoelastic material model representing unvulcanized rubber to show the potential of MPM for tire molding simulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PAMM
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.202400033
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mitigation Techniques for Volumetric Locking in the Implicit Material Point Method (MPM)

Michael Kaliske, Julian Meyer
3 citations
PAMM
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
1.12
article

Mitigation Techniques for Volumetric Locking in the Implicit Material Point Method (MPM)

Michael Kaliske, Julian Meyer
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The material point method (MPM) aims to avoid mesh distortion problems occurring in the commonly used finite element method (FEM). To achieve this, the continuum is discretized as a set of material points, while the solution of the weak form of the underlying partial differential equations is conducted on an Eulerian background mesh. As this process works similar to FEM, the MPM also displays volumetric locking for near‐incompressible materials. However, this also means that mitigation techniques developed for FEM can be adapted to the MPM. The main difficulty for this process lies in the higher‐continuity basis functions, which are required in MPM to achieve reasonable results. This study first reviews the applicability of different locking mitigation techniques in MPM. Then, a framework for a locking‐free implicit MPM is presented and validated using common tests investigating the locking behavior and stress oscillations. Finally, the presented methods are applied to a viscoelastic material model representing unvulcanized rubber to show the potential of MPM for tire molding simulations.

PAMMVol. 24(4)
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
1.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mitigation Techniques for Volumetric Locking in the Implicit Material Point Method (MPM) — Michael Kaliske, Julian Meyer · PAMM (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS