How political ideology relates to political branding in the United States: A longitudinal analysis of the 2016, 2018, and 2020 elections

Do republican voters always care about financial security? Do democrat voters always want care for immigrants? This research examines political ideology aspects over a period of three election cycles in the United States to study the ideological connections with republican and democrat voters. These relationships are important to understand as political candidates use marketing strategies to create and maintain their brand image, and thus, turn themselves into “brandidates.” Unlike those existing studies that focus on how to build a political brand image, this research examines how voter political ideology is related to the branded image candidates build for themselves. This research assesses this relationship over three election cycles (2016, 2018, 2020) allowing us to understand, through a longitudinal analysis, not only the strength of these relationships, but also which ideologies are un/stable in their association with specific political candidates/parties. Ten constructs are employed to measure the aspects of political ideology and are linked together through the overarching framework of integrated threat theory and are primarily explained by the three theories of social identity, economic insecurity, and systems justification. Practically, these findings can be used by candidates, campaign managers, political parties, and marketing consultants to better connect with the electorate and appeal to existing supporters, undecided voters, and possibly those from other parties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Market Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853241304282
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How political ideology relates to political branding in the United States: A longitudinal analysis of the 2016, 2018, and 2020 elections

Shawn T. Thelen, Kristina Harrison, Boonghee Yoo
3 citations
International Journal of Market Research
Social and Intergroup Psychology
3.40
article

How political ideology relates to political branding in the United States: A longitudinal analysis of the 2016, 2018, and 2020 elections

Shawn T. Thelen, Kristina Harrison, Boonghee Yoo
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Do republican voters always care about financial security? Do democrat voters always want care for immigrants? This research examines political ideology aspects over a period of three election cycles in the United States to study the ideological connections with republican and democrat voters. These relationships are important to understand as political candidates use marketing strategies to create and maintain their brand image, and thus, turn themselves into “brandidates.” Unlike those existing studies that focus on how to build a political brand image, this research examines how voter political ideology is related to the branded image candidates build for themselves. This research assesses this relationship over three election cycles (2016, 2018, 2020) allowing us to understand, through a longitudinal analysis, not only the strength of these relationships, but also which ideologies are un/stable in their association with specific political candidates/parties. Ten constructs are employed to measure the aspects of political ideology and are linked together through the overarching framework of integrated threat theory and are primarily explained by the three theories of social identity, economic insecurity, and systems justification. Practically, these findings can be used by candidates, campaign managers, political parties, and marketing consultants to better connect with the electorate and appeal to existing supporters, undecided voters, and possibly those from other parties.

International Journal of Market ResearchVol. 67(2-3)
Hofstra University (US), Indiana State University (US)
Old Dominion University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.