Comparative effect of in-person and virtual methods of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing on the fear of COVID-19 among nurses: a three-armed randomized control trial

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the fear of COVID-19 increased, especially among nurses. The present study investigated the effect of in-person and virtual methods of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on the fear of COVID-19 among nurses. In a three-armed randomized control trial, the sample comprised 141 nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Eligible individuals were randomly assigned in study groups (virtual EMDR, in-person EMDR, and control) using balanced block method with a block size of six. The main outcome of the study was the fear of COVID-19 assessed before, immediately after, and three months after intervention. The secondary outcomes assessed included anxiety, depression and work-related quality of life assessed before and three months after the intervention. The results of variance-covariance analysis for repeated measures showed a significant reduction in the mean score fear of COVID-19 immediately after and three months after the intervention in the in-person EMDR intervention group compared to the virtual group (mean difference equal to -3.48 and -3.57) and the control group (mean difference equal to -5.45 and -5.57). Considering the minimum clinically significant difference was equal to 2.54 on the Fear of COVID-19 Scale, this reduction was also clinically significant. The average number of intervention sessions was two. No significant difference was observed regarding anxiety, depression and work-related quality of life after intervention between all three groups. In-person EMDR is more effective than the virtual EMDR as a non-pharmacological method in the treatment of fear of COVID-19 among nurses. In-person EMDR should be conducted in preference to virtual EMDR. However, in situations where in-person EMDR cannot be conducted, virtual EMDR could be considered as a potential alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2024.2430862
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative effect of in-person and virtual methods of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing on the fear of COVID-19 among nurses: a three-armed randomized control trial

Mark Damian Griffiths, Zainab Alimoradi, Mohammad Moradi Baglooei, Mohammadreza Sheikhi et al.
Cogent Psychology
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Comparative effect of in-person and virtual methods of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing on the fear of COVID-19 among nurses: a three-armed randomized control trial

Mark Damian Griffiths, Zainab Alimoradi, Mohammad Moradi Baglooei, Mohammadreza Sheikhi, Seyyed Mehdi Mousavi
article en

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the fear of COVID-19 increased, especially among nurses. The present study investigated the effect of in-person and virtual methods of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on the fear of COVID-19 among nurses. In a three-armed randomized control trial, the sample comprised 141 nurses working in hospitals affiliated to Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Eligible individuals were randomly assigned in study groups (virtual EMDR, in-person EMDR, and control) using balanced block method with a block size of six. The main outcome of the study was the fear of COVID-19 assessed before, immediately after, and three months after intervention. The secondary outcomes assessed included anxiety, depression and work-related quality of life assessed before and three months after the intervention. The results of variance-covariance analysis for repeated measures showed a significant reduction in the mean score fear of COVID-19 immediately after and three months after the intervention in the in-person EMDR intervention group compared to the virtual group (mean difference equal to -3.48 and -3.57) and the control group (mean difference equal to -5.45 and -5.57). Considering the minimum clinically significant difference was equal to 2.54 on the Fear of COVID-19 Scale, this reduction was also clinically significant. The average number of intervention sessions was two. No significant difference was observed regarding anxiety, depression and work-related quality of life after intervention between all three groups. In-person EMDR is more effective than the virtual EMDR as a non-pharmacological method in the treatment of fear of COVID-19 among nurses. In-person EMDR should be conducted in preference to virtual EMDR. However, in situations where in-person EMDR cannot be conducted, virtual EMDR could be considered as a potential alternative.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 11(1)
Nottingham Trent University (GB), Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.