Insights Gained from the Review of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Studies in Italy

We conducted a systematic literature review of 105 landslide susceptibility studies in Italy from 1980 to 2023, retrieved from the Scopus database. We discovered that Italian researchers primarily focus on rainfall-induced landslides (86.67% of the articles), especially shallow and fast movements (60%), with 72% of studies conducted at the local scale, while regional and national-level studies are rare. The most common data sources include remote sensing images validated by field surveys and official data portals at the national or regional level. Data splitting usually follows a 70:30 ratio and 24 modelling techniques were identified, with logistic regression being historically prevalent, although machine learning methods have rapidly gained popularity. Italian studies used 97 predisposing factors, with slope angle (98.09%), lithology (89.52%), land use/land cover (78.09%), and aspect (77.14%) being the most employed. This review also identifies and discusses a few less-used factors, like soil sealing, rainfall, NDVI, and proximity to faults, which showed promising results in experimental studies. Predisposing factors are generally selected by expert judgment, but methods for forward factors selection and collinearity tests are becoming more common. This review synthesizes current knowledge, pinpointing gaps, highlighting emerging methodologies, and suggesting future research directions for better integration of susceptibility studies with landslide risk management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234491
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights Gained from the Review of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Studies in Italy

Samuele Segoni, Riccardo Fanti, Nicola Nocentini, R. S. Ajin
23 citations
Remote Sensing
Landslides and related hazards
16.33
article

Insights Gained from the Review of Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Studies in Italy

Samuele Segoni, Riccardo Fanti, Nicola Nocentini, R. S. Ajin
article en
23 citations

Abstract

We conducted a systematic literature review of 105 landslide susceptibility studies in Italy from 1980 to 2023, retrieved from the Scopus database. We discovered that Italian researchers primarily focus on rainfall-induced landslides (86.67% of the articles), especially shallow and fast movements (60%), with 72% of studies conducted at the local scale, while regional and national-level studies are rare. The most common data sources include remote sensing images validated by field surveys and official data portals at the national or regional level. Data splitting usually follows a 70:30 ratio and 24 modelling techniques were identified, with logistic regression being historically prevalent, although machine learning methods have rapidly gained popularity. Italian studies used 97 predisposing factors, with slope angle (98.09%), lithology (89.52%), land use/land cover (78.09%), and aspect (77.14%) being the most employed. This review also identifies and discusses a few less-used factors, like soil sealing, rainfall, NDVI, and proximity to faults, which showed promising results in experimental studies. Predisposing factors are generally selected by expert judgment, but methods for forward factors selection and collinearity tests are becoming more common. This review synthesizes current knowledge, pinpointing gaps, highlighting emerging methodologies, and suggesting future research directions for better integration of susceptibility studies with landslide risk management.

Remote SensingVol. 16(23)
University of Padua (IT), University of Florence (IT)
European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Landslides and related hazards
16.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.