A Novel Sensitivity Maximization at a Given Specificity Method for Binary Classifications

In the cancer early detection field, logistic regression (LR) is a frequently used approach to establish a combination rule that differentiates cancer from noncancer. However, the application of LR relies on a maximum likelihood approach, which may not yield optimal combination rules for maximizing sensitivity at a clinically desirable specificity and vice versa. In this article, we have developed an improved regression framework, sensitivity maximization at a given specificity (SMAGS), for binary classification that finds the linear decision rule, yielding the maximum sensitivity for a given specificity or the maximum specificity for a given sensitivity. We additionally expand the framework for feature selection that satisfies sensitivity and specificity maximizations. We compare our SMAGS method with normal LR using two synthetic datasets and reported data for colorectal cancer from the 2018 CancerSEEK study. In the colorectal cancer CancerSEEK dataset, we report 14% improvement in sensitivity at 98.5% specificity (0.31 vs. 0.57; P value <0.05). The SMAGS method provides an alternative to LR for modeling combination rules for biomarkers and early detection applications. Prevention Relevance: This study introduces a new machine learning methodology that identifies the optimal features and combination rules to maximize sensitivity at a fixed specificity, making it applicable to many existing biomarker prevention studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.capr-24-0236
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Sensitivity Maximization at a Given Specificity Method for Binary Classifications

Ehsan Irajizad, Samir Hanash, Kim‐Anh Do, James P. Long et al.
2 citations
Cancer Prevention Research
Statistical Methods and Inference
1.42
article

A Novel Sensitivity Maximization at a Given Specificity Method for Binary Classifications

Ehsan Irajizad, Samir Hanash, Kim‐Anh Do, James P. Long, Johannes Francois Fahrmann, Chunhui Gu, Seyyed Mahmood Ghasemi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In the cancer early detection field, logistic regression (LR) is a frequently used approach to establish a combination rule that differentiates cancer from noncancer. However, the application of LR relies on a maximum likelihood approach, which may not yield optimal combination rules for maximizing sensitivity at a clinically desirable specificity and vice versa. In this article, we have developed an improved regression framework, sensitivity maximization at a given specificity (SMAGS), for binary classification that finds the linear decision rule, yielding the maximum sensitivity for a given specificity or the maximum specificity for a given sensitivity. We additionally expand the framework for feature selection that satisfies sensitivity and specificity maximizations. We compare our SMAGS method with normal LR using two synthetic datasets and reported data for colorectal cancer from the 2018 CancerSEEK study. In the colorectal cancer CancerSEEK dataset, we report 14% improvement in sensitivity at 98.5% specificity (0.31 vs. 0.57; P value <0.05). The SMAGS method provides an alternative to LR for modeling combination rules for biomarkers and early detection applications. Prevention Relevance: This study introduces a new machine learning methodology that identifies the optimal features and combination rules to maximize sensitivity at a fixed specificity, making it applicable to many existing biomarker prevention studies.

Cancer Prevention ResearchVol. 18(3)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Lyda Hill Philanthropies, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Statistical Methods and Inference
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.