Architecture: Cause or Cure for Eco-Anxiety?

Construction is the main cause for global raw material extraction, and a key source of greenhouse gas emissions. Through the increasing consumption of resources, it is driving us beyond the planetary boundaries. We argue that in this light, the connection of the environmental impacts of new buildings and the symptoms of eco-anxiety among their designers, builders, users, and funders needs investigation and discussion.Art, culture, and rituals have been proposed as means to process and cope with difficult eco-emotions, including anxiety. Architecture is an important part of culture, oftentimes defined as, or including aspects of art, and can have symbolic meanings. Hence, it may also hold potential for dealing with difficult feelings, through e.g., memorial places. More importantly, however, regenerative, and emphatic architecture could support a shift of values away from an environmentally harmful construction culture towards building within planetary boundaries. This requires defining architecture from a new perspective, acknowledging its role in causing friction between values and acting thus as a driver for the ensuing predominantly negative emotions such as environmental anxiety. Design choices or architecture do not, however, need to be antithetical to environmental awareness, on the contrary. In this article, we present and discuss the dual role of architecture in relation to eco-anxiety. On one hand, architecture drives the consumption of resources, which causes significant environmental damage, and may hence spur difficult eco-emotions. On the other hand, architecture could be used for mitigating resource consumption as well as for offering re-evaluation of our construction culture, which is destructive for the wellbeing of our planet. Architecture could also create spaces where people are able to engage constructively with eco-emotions. Overall, we argue that architecture needs stronger value discourse. Conscious decisions, awareness-raising and skill-building can enable designers and teachers of design-related studies to better take eco-anxiety and other eco-emotions into account.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in health technology and informatics
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti240955
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architecture: Cause or Cure for Eco-Anxiety?

Matti Kuittinen, Sanna Lehtinen, Panu Pihkala
Studies in health technology and informatics
Environmental Education and Sustainability
article

Architecture: Cause or Cure for Eco-Anxiety?

Matti Kuittinen, Sanna Lehtinen, Panu Pihkala
article en

Abstract

Construction is the main cause for global raw material extraction, and a key source of greenhouse gas emissions. Through the increasing consumption of resources, it is driving us beyond the planetary boundaries. We argue that in this light, the connection of the environmental impacts of new buildings and the symptoms of eco-anxiety among their designers, builders, users, and funders needs investigation and discussion.Art, culture, and rituals have been proposed as means to process and cope with difficult eco-emotions, including anxiety. Architecture is an important part of culture, oftentimes defined as, or including aspects of art, and can have symbolic meanings. Hence, it may also hold potential for dealing with difficult feelings, through e.g., memorial places. More importantly, however, regenerative, and emphatic architecture could support a shift of values away from an environmentally harmful construction culture towards building within planetary boundaries. This requires defining architecture from a new perspective, acknowledging its role in causing friction between values and acting thus as a driver for the ensuing predominantly negative emotions such as environmental anxiety. Design choices or architecture do not, however, need to be antithetical to environmental awareness, on the contrary. In this article, we present and discuss the dual role of architecture in relation to eco-anxiety. On one hand, architecture drives the consumption of resources, which causes significant environmental damage, and may hence spur difficult eco-emotions. On the other hand, architecture could be used for mitigating resource consumption as well as for offering re-evaluation of our construction culture, which is destructive for the wellbeing of our planet. Architecture could also create spaces where people are able to engage constructively with eco-emotions. Overall, we argue that architecture needs stronger value discourse. Conscious decisions, awareness-raising and skill-building can enable designers and teachers of design-related studies to better take eco-anxiety and other eco-emotions into account.

Studies in health technology and informaticsVol. 319
University of Helsinki (FI), Aalto University (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.