Enhancing the Integration of Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenetic (PGx) Testing in Primary Care: Prioritizing Underserved Patients’ Preferences in Implementation

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The integration of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into primary care has not been widely implemented, despite its benefits for patients and providers. PGx testing could also reduce health disparities as patients with lower healthcare access are prescribed higher proportions of medications with PGx guidelines. Little is known about the preferences of patients who have experienced PGx testing to inform implementation across the care process. This qualitative study aimed to refine implementation by capturing patient preferences on (1) testing and prescription timing, (2) patient-clinician discussion of results during post-test counseling, and (3) usability of a card during results dissemination. <b>Methods</b>: Interviews were conducted with 25 primary care patients from clinics primarily serving medically underserved populations. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using a constant comparative approach. <b>Results</b>: While patients supported both reactive and pre-emptive testing, they valued pre-emptive PGx testing because it is <i>proactive for future health needs</i>, <i>expedites treatment</i>, and is <i>convenient</i>. Patients' preferences for receiving prescriptions depended on several factors: <i>having immediate access to needed medications, avoiding experiencing medication side effects and interactions</i>, <i>avoiding taking ineffective medications</i>, and <i>avoiding inconveniences</i>. Patients identified three issues critical to patient-clinician interactions when receiving testing results: <i>information specific to medications</i>, <i>clarification and further information about their results</i>, and <i>enhanced clinician accessibility related to the results</i>. Lastly, they liked that the results card could <i>facilitate discussions with clinicians and was informative</i> and <i>convenient</i> but said it lacked <i>clarity</i>. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings should inform implementation strategies for integrating PGx testing in primary care for underserved patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14121128
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing the Integration of Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenetic (PGx) Testing in Primary Care: Prioritizing Underserved Patients’ Preferences in Implementation

Erica N. Elwood, Brian E. Gawronski, Kelsey Lunsford, Julio D. Duarte et al.
4 citations
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
4.44
article

Enhancing the Integration of Pre-Emptive Pharmacogenetic (PGx) Testing in Primary Care: Prioritizing Underserved Patients’ Preferences in Implementation

Erica N. Elwood, Brian E. Gawronski, Kelsey Lunsford, Julio D. Duarte, Carla L. Fisher, Michaela D. Mullis, Antionette McFarlane, Emma Bryan
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The integration of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into primary care has not been widely implemented, despite its benefits for patients and providers. PGx testing could also reduce health disparities as patients with lower healthcare access are prescribed higher proportions of medications with PGx guidelines. Little is known about the preferences of patients who have experienced PGx testing to inform implementation across the care process. This qualitative study aimed to refine implementation by capturing patient preferences on (1) testing and prescription timing, (2) patient-clinician discussion of results during post-test counseling, and (3) usability of a card during results dissemination. <b>Methods</b>: Interviews were conducted with 25 primary care patients from clinics primarily serving medically underserved populations. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using a constant comparative approach. <b>Results</b>: While patients supported both reactive and pre-emptive testing, they valued pre-emptive PGx testing because it is <i>proactive for future health needs</i>, <i>expedites treatment</i>, and is <i>convenient</i>. Patients' preferences for receiving prescriptions depended on several factors: <i>having immediate access to needed medications, avoiding experiencing medication side effects and interactions</i>, <i>avoiding taking ineffective medications</i>, and <i>avoiding inconveniences</i>. Patients identified three issues critical to patient-clinician interactions when receiving testing results: <i>information specific to medications</i>, <i>clarification and further information about their results</i>, and <i>enhanced clinician accessibility related to the results</i>. Lastly, they liked that the results card could <i>facilitate discussions with clinicians and was informative</i> and <i>convenient</i> but said it lacked <i>clarity</i>. <b>Conclusions</b>: These findings should inform implementation strategies for integrating PGx testing in primary care for underserved patients.

Journal of Personalized MedicineVol. 14(12)
University of Florida (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pharmaceutical studies and practices
4.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.