The European Commission’s Challenge to Consent or Pay: Demystifying the Digital Markets Act?

The European Union’s (EU’s) Digital Markets Act (DMA) was hailed as a new era of digital regulation following a decade of debates on the flexibility of traditional competition law. Article 5(2) DMA requires gatekeepers to offer users a choice to opt-out of the data exchanges across a gatekeeper’s services. Half a year after becoming applicable, its fitness for purpose and theoretical underpinnings are in the spotlight as the European Commission (EC) investigates Meta’s consent or pay solution on the assumption that such a model is not compliant. This paper considers whether this assumption is supported by an interpretation of Article 5(2) DMA and assesses the risks posed by the EC’s position to the integrity of the DMA and its aim to revolutionize competition law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Competition
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/woco2024026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The European Commission’s Challenge to Consent or Pay: Demystifying the Digital Markets Act?

Emma Grace Lewis, Malte Frank
1 citations
World Competition
European and International Law Studies
2.23
article

The European Commission’s Challenge to Consent or Pay: Demystifying the Digital Markets Act?

Emma Grace Lewis, Malte Frank
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The European Union’s (EU’s) Digital Markets Act (DMA) was hailed as a new era of digital regulation following a decade of debates on the flexibility of traditional competition law. Article 5(2) DMA requires gatekeepers to offer users a choice to opt-out of the data exchanges across a gatekeeper’s services. Half a year after becoming applicable, its fitness for purpose and theoretical underpinnings are in the spotlight as the European Commission (EC) investigates Meta’s consent or pay solution on the assumption that such a model is not compliant. This paper considers whether this assumption is supported by an interpretation of Article 5(2) DMA and assesses the risks posed by the EC’s position to the integrity of the DMA and its aim to revolutionize competition law.

World CompetitionVol. 47(Issue 4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
European and International Law Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.