Hybrid Ideologies in Clinical Settings: Implications for Intervention of the Changing Landscape in Violent Extremism

Practitioners are observing rapid transformations in the landscape of violent ideologies. To understand the role and importance of changing ideologies for preventive interventions, this article describes the prevalence of hybrid ideologies in a clinical sample of clients referred for attraction toward or involvement in violent extremism and documents clinicians’ perspectives. Results demonstrate that hybrid ideologies are common and suggest that both homogenisation and fragmentation processes associated with globalisation and digitalisation may explain the observed shift in ideological presentation. These changes may have significant implications for intervention and call for a redefinition of ideological categories and silo approaches in the field.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on terrorism
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19165/2024.4965
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Ideologies in Clinical Settings: Implications for Intervention of the Changing Landscape in Violent Extremism

Cindy Ngov, Samuel P. L. Veissière, Cécile Rousseau, Christian Savard et al.
2 citations
Perspectives on terrorism
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
article

Hybrid Ideologies in Clinical Settings: Implications for Intervention of the Changing Landscape in Violent Extremism

Cindy Ngov, Samuel P. L. Veissière, Cécile Rousseau, Christian Savard, Janique Johnson‐Lafleur
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Practitioners are observing rapid transformations in the landscape of violent ideologies. To understand the role and importance of changing ideologies for preventive interventions, this article describes the prevalence of hybrid ideologies in a clinical sample of clients referred for attraction toward or involvement in violent extremism and documents clinicians’ perspectives. Results demonstrate that hybrid ideologies are common and suggest that both homogenisation and fragmentation processes associated with globalisation and digitalisation may explain the observed shift in ideological presentation. These changes may have significant implications for intervention and call for a redefinition of ideological categories and silo approaches in the field.

Perspectives on terrorismVol. 18(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hybrid Ideologies in Clinical Settings: Implications for Intervention of the Changing Landscape in Violent Extremism — Cindy Ngov, Samuel P. L. Veissière, et al. · Perspectives on terrorism (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS