Generating a Reflexive AI-Assisted Workflow for Academic Writing

Digital research workflows are study designs that intentionally consider the use of technology in meaningful and reflexive ways. While most scholars use digital tools and spaces in their research process, doing so has consequences that are infrequently considered in an intentional way. Especially in this age of generative AI, technology integration into research studies will have an even greater impact and consequences on study outcomes. This paper documents one digital research workflow, the academic writing process, to demonstrate how inviting generative AI to be a writing partner can be done in a reflexive manner. Drawing on Paulus and Lester’s (2023) technological reflexivity framework, we emphasize the need to assess the use and impact of platforms such as ChatGPT on four dimensions of the academic writing workflow: writing methods, writers and their audience, writing outcomes, and the generative AI platform itself. We structure this use case according to Woolf and Silver’s (2018) notions of “strategies” and “tactics,” applied to the academic writing process, combined with Paulus and Lester’s four consequence categories. We include recommendations for navigating and using generative artificial intelligence in future academic writing endeavors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Qualitative Report
Published
2024-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7634
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generating a Reflexive AI-Assisted Workflow for Academic Writing

Corey W. Johnson, Treena M. Paulus
5 citations
The Qualitative Report
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.64
article

Generating a Reflexive AI-Assisted Workflow for Academic Writing

Corey W. Johnson, Treena M. Paulus
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Digital research workflows are study designs that intentionally consider the use of technology in meaningful and reflexive ways. While most scholars use digital tools and spaces in their research process, doing so has consequences that are infrequently considered in an intentional way. Especially in this age of generative AI, technology integration into research studies will have an even greater impact and consequences on study outcomes. This paper documents one digital research workflow, the academic writing process, to demonstrate how inviting generative AI to be a writing partner can be done in a reflexive manner. Drawing on Paulus and Lester’s (2023) technological reflexivity framework, we emphasize the need to assess the use and impact of platforms such as ChatGPT on four dimensions of the academic writing workflow: writing methods, writers and their audience, writing outcomes, and the generative AI platform itself. We structure this use case according to Woolf and Silver’s (2018) notions of “strategies” and “tactics,” applied to the academic writing process, combined with Paulus and Lester’s four consequence categories. We include recommendations for navigating and using generative artificial intelligence in future academic writing endeavors.

The Qualitative Report
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
2.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Generating a Reflexive AI-Assisted Workflow for Academic Writing — Corey W. Johnson, Treena M. Paulus · The Qualitative Report (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS