Methodology for assessment of illegally obtained evidence in criminal procedure: regional standards and national law problems

In analyzing evidence obtained illegally it is essential to address both regional standards and specific aspects of national law. The correct assessment of these aspects is crucial for ensuring fair justice and respect for fundamental rights. In order to assist the adoption of decisions by judges and prosecutors in the matter of illegally obtained evidence, at the end of the article we propose some methods developed on the basis of comparative research, which are based on the regional jurisprudence of some member states of the European Union. These methods incorporate different rationales for excluding illegally obtained evidence and allow us to assess the impact of the violation of legal norms on the collection of evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59295/ssdoed2024.30
Primary Topic
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodology for assessment of illegally obtained evidence in criminal procedure: regional standards and national law problems

Svetlana Leontieva, Vlad Toderica
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
article

Methodology for assessment of illegally obtained evidence in criminal procedure: regional standards and national law problems

Svetlana Leontieva, Vlad Toderica
article en

Abstract

In analyzing evidence obtained illegally it is essential to address both regional standards and specific aspects of national law. The correct assessment of these aspects is crucial for ensuring fair justice and respect for fundamental rights. In order to assist the adoption of decisions by judges and prosecutors in the matter of illegally obtained evidence, at the end of the article we propose some methods developed on the basis of comparative research, which are based on the regional jurisprudence of some member states of the European Union. These methods incorporate different rationales for excluding illegally obtained evidence and allow us to assess the impact of the violation of legal norms on the collection of evidence.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.