Whom to Save? A Novel, Realistic Paradigm for Studying Human Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas
How can we examine human decision-making in extreme situations? Previous studies often show limitations in realism and flexibility of the experiment environment. Here, we propose a novel virtual paradigm involving multi-staged moral decision-making under time pressure in a realistic scenario, in which participants need to decide whom to save. This paradigm allows for detailed, controlled investigations of fundamental aspects of moral decision-making, including correlations with personality traits, self-sacrifice, and moral thresholds. We also discuss pilot results that attest good realism and establish interesting trends for decision-making related to psychopathy and utilitarian personality traits as well as environmental features, showcasing the potential of our paradigm.
Authors
- Jae Hoon Jang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0580-4011)
- Christian Wallraven (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2604-9115)
Institutions
- Korea University (KR)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-21
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar-adjunct64951.2024.00105
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.34
Funders
- National Research Foundation
- Korea University