Whom to Save? A Novel, Realistic Paradigm for Studying Human Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas

How can we examine human decision-making in extreme situations? Previous studies often show limitations in realism and flexibility of the experiment environment. Here, we propose a novel virtual paradigm involving multi-staged moral decision-making under time pressure in a realistic scenario, in which participants need to decide whom to save. This paradigm allows for detailed, controlled investigations of fundamental aspects of moral decision-making, including correlations with personality traits, self-sacrifice, and moral thresholds. We also discuss pilot results that attest good realism and establish interesting trends for decision-making related to psychopathy and utilitarian personality traits as well as environmental features, showcasing the potential of our paradigm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar-adjunct64951.2024.00105
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whom to Save? A Novel, Realistic Paradigm for Studying Human Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas

Jae Hoon Jang, Christian Wallraven
1 citations
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.34
article

Whom to Save? A Novel, Realistic Paradigm for Studying Human Decision-Making in Moral Dilemmas

Jae Hoon Jang, Christian Wallraven
article en
1 citations

Abstract

How can we examine human decision-making in extreme situations? Previous studies often show limitations in realism and flexibility of the experiment environment. Here, we propose a novel virtual paradigm involving multi-staged moral decision-making under time pressure in a realistic scenario, in which participants need to decide whom to save. This paradigm allows for detailed, controlled investigations of fundamental aspects of moral decision-making, including correlations with personality traits, self-sacrifice, and moral thresholds. We also discuss pilot results that attest good realism and establish interesting trends for decision-making related to psychopathy and utilitarian personality traits as well as environmental features, showcasing the potential of our paradigm.

Korea University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Korea University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.