Plagiarism on Mobile Programming Assessments: Automated Detection

In programming education, programming ethics are maintained by educating students about the matter and penalize those who breach the regulations. There are a number of plagiarism detectors available for programming. However, none of them are focused on mobile programming assessments though mobile programming becomes more popular nowadays. This paper presents a plagiarism detector for such assessments, focusing on Dart and Flutter. The detector tokenize student submissions, generalize identifier names and constants, and compare the submissions in a pairwise manner with MinHash. Although our detector cannot deal with some plagiarism disguises (program statement replacement and logic change), it can result in no less than 85% top-K precision on most occasions. It is quite efficient since it can perform 2400 comparisons in three seconds. The processing time might be longer for more submissions with larger amount of code.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictiia61827.2024.10761687
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plagiarism on Mobile Programming Assessments: Automated Detection

Meliana Christianti Johan, Oscar Karnalim, Daniel Jahja Surjawan, Erico Darmawan Handoyo
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Plagiarism on Mobile Programming Assessments: Automated Detection

Meliana Christianti Johan, Oscar Karnalim, Daniel Jahja Surjawan, Erico Darmawan Handoyo
article en

Abstract

In programming education, programming ethics are maintained by educating students about the matter and penalize those who breach the regulations. There are a number of plagiarism detectors available for programming. However, none of them are focused on mobile programming assessments though mobile programming becomes more popular nowadays. This paper presents a plagiarism detector for such assessments, focusing on Dart and Flutter. The detector tokenize student submissions, generalize identifier names and constants, and compare the submissions in a pairwise manner with MinHash. Although our detector cannot deal with some plagiarism disguises (program statement replacement and logic change), it can result in no less than 85% top-K precision on most occasions. It is quite efficient since it can perform 2400 comparisons in three seconds. The processing time might be longer for more submissions with larger amount of code.

Maranatha Christian University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Plagiarism on Mobile Programming Assessments: Automated Detection — Meliana Christianti Johan, Oscar Karnalim, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS