Deciphering Key Features in Online Buying Session Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes

This paper explores the key factors influencing online buying session prediction using nomogram analysis with Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes models. We analyzed a dataset containing various attributes of online shoppers. Our results underscore that the Logistic Regression has superior capability for both True and False targets in terms of accuracy (0.883) and AUC (0.897). While Naïve Bayes performs better for the True target with an F1Score of 0.555, Logistic Regression demonstrates superior performance for the False target with an F1 Score of 0.934. Nomogram analysis revealed that for Naive Bayes, page values, exit rates, and bounce rates are the most significant factors, while for Logistic Regression, page values and product-related features (ProductRelated and ProductRelated_Duration) are the most significant. Visualizing these key factors through nomograms helps interpret their relative importance to support the accuracy and interpretability of machine learning predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ictiia61827.2024.10761491
Primary Topic
Color perception and design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deciphering Key Features in Online Buying Session Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes

Arnold Aribowo, I Made Murwantara
Color perception and design
article

Deciphering Key Features in Online Buying Session Prediction Using Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes

Arnold Aribowo, I Made Murwantara
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the key factors influencing online buying session prediction using nomogram analysis with Logistic Regression and Naive Bayes models. We analyzed a dataset containing various attributes of online shoppers. Our results underscore that the Logistic Regression has superior capability for both True and False targets in terms of accuracy (0.883) and AUC (0.897). While Naïve Bayes performs better for the True target with an F1Score of 0.555, Logistic Regression demonstrates superior performance for the False target with an F1 Score of 0.934. Nomogram analysis revealed that for Naive Bayes, page values, exit rates, and bounce rates are the most significant factors, while for Logistic Regression, page values and product-related features (ProductRelated and ProductRelated_Duration) are the most significant. Visualizing these key factors through nomograms helps interpret their relative importance to support the accuracy and interpretability of machine learning predictions.

Pelita Harapan University (ID)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Color perception and design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.