Addressing Human Factors Related to Artificial Intelligence Integrated Visual Cueing

A variety of assistive extended reality (XR) visual cueing techniques have been explored over the years. Many of which provide significant benefits to tasks such as visual search. However, when the cueing system is erroneous, performance may instead suffer. Factors such as automation bias, where an individual trusts the cueing system despite errors in the cueing may affect task efficacy (i.e. completion time, accuracy, etc.). In some cases, such as with automation bias, these hindrances may be the product of artificial intelligence (AI) integration. Despite this, there may be benefits to using adaptive AI-based cueing systems for XR tasks. However, aspects such as the flow of information, automation accuracy, communication of confidence, or the refusal of output must be considered to build effective AI adaptive cueing systems. In this paper, we discuss four studies conducted by our group that explore visual cueing and AI. We then discuss potential future avenues for integrating AI into cueing techniques to minimize automation bias and cognitive demand on users, as well as, improve overall cueing outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ismar-adjunct64951.2024.00051
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Human Factors Related to Artificial Intelligence Integrated Visual Cueing

Brendan Kelley, Aditya Raikwar, Francisco R. Ortega, Benjamin A. Clegg et al.
2 citations
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
article

Addressing Human Factors Related to Artificial Intelligence Integrated Visual Cueing

Brendan Kelley, Aditya Raikwar, Francisco R. Ortega, Benjamin A. Clegg, Chris Wickens, Ryan P. McMahan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A variety of assistive extended reality (XR) visual cueing techniques have been explored over the years. Many of which provide significant benefits to tasks such as visual search. However, when the cueing system is erroneous, performance may instead suffer. Factors such as automation bias, where an individual trusts the cueing system despite errors in the cueing may affect task efficacy (i.e. completion time, accuracy, etc.). In some cases, such as with automation bias, these hindrances may be the product of artificial intelligence (AI) integration. Despite this, there may be benefits to using adaptive AI-based cueing systems for XR tasks. However, aspects such as the flow of information, automation accuracy, communication of confidence, or the refusal of output must be considered to build effective AI adaptive cueing systems. In this paper, we discuss four studies conducted by our group that explore visual cueing and AI. We then discuss potential future avenues for integrating AI into cueing techniques to minimize automation bias and cognitive demand on users, as well as, improve overall cueing outcomes.

Montana State University (US), Virginia Tech (US), Colorado State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.