"Must Be a Tuesday": Affect, Attribution, and Geographic Variability in Equity-Oriented Visualizations of Population Health Disparities

This study examines the impacts of public health communications visualizing risk disparities between racial and other social groups. It compares the effects of traditional bar charts to an alternative design emphasizing geographic variability with differing annotations and jitter plots. Whereas both visualization designs increased perceived vulnerability, behavioral intent, and policy support, the geo-emphasized charts were significantly more effective in reducing personal attribution biases. The findings also reveal emotionally taxing experiences for chart viewers from marginalized communities. This work suggests a need for strategic reevaluation of visual communication tools in public health to enhance understanding and engagement without reinforcing stereotypes or emotional distress.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/vis55277.2024.00021
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Must Be a Tuesday": Affect, Attribution, and Geographic Variability in Equity-Oriented Visualizations of Population Health Disparities

Lace Padilla, Eli Holder
2 citations
Health disparities and outcomes
1.06
article

"Must Be a Tuesday": Affect, Attribution, and Geographic Variability in Equity-Oriented Visualizations of Population Health Disparities

Lace Padilla, Eli Holder
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines the impacts of public health communications visualizing risk disparities between racial and other social groups. It compares the effects of traditional bar charts to an alternative design emphasizing geographic variability with differing annotations and jitter plots. Whereas both visualization designs increased perceived vulnerability, behavioral intent, and policy support, the geo-emphasized charts were significantly more effective in reducing personal attribution biases. The findings also reveal emotionally taxing experiences for chart viewers from marginalized communities. This work suggests a need for strategic reevaluation of visual communication tools in public health to enhance understanding and engagement without reinforcing stereotypes or emotional distress.

Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Health disparities and outcomes
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.