Detectability of Structural Damage to a Lattice Tower using Eigenfrequencies and Gaussian Process Regression

One main challenge in structural health monitoring is distinguishing between the effects of actual system changes and changing environmental conditions (EC) on the monitored parameters. For this, data normalisation can be performed. Through the utilisation of Gaussian process (GP) regression, it is possible to map the influences of the ECs on the monitored parameters and simultaneously obtain confidence intervals of the predictions. The assumption of standard GPs is homoscedasticity, meaning a constant noise variance of the parameters. However, there is still a lack of research regarding the correctness of this assumption for different types of structures and damage sensitive features. Furthermore, the potential of normalisation techniques that enable the consideration of EC-dependent uncertainties should be analysed. In this real-world case study, damage detectability is investigated using GPs and eigenfrequencies. In contrast to standard homoscedastic GPs, heteroscedastic GPs can account for input-dependent uncertainties. Both methods are compared using real data from a lattice tower. Firstly, it is shown that the homoscedastic assumption does not hold for the eigenfrequencies of the lattice tower. Consequently, the heteroscedastic GPs enable more reliable damage detection than homoscedastic GPs when using a probabilistic novelty metric. Also, in the heteroscedastic case, the additional information on the uncertainty of the prediction increases the interpretability of the results.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research and Review Journal of Nondestructive Testing
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58286/30526
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detectability of Structural Damage to a Lattice Tower using Eigenfrequencies and Gaussian Process Regression

Clemens Jonscher, Tanja Grießmann, Raimund Rolfes, Britt Kahrger et al.
2 citations
Research and Review Journal of Nondestructive Testing
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
0.52
article

Detectability of Structural Damage to a Lattice Tower using Eigenfrequencies and Gaussian Process Regression

Clemens Jonscher, Tanja Grießmann, Raimund Rolfes, Britt Kahrger, Sören Kai Möller
article en
2 citations

Abstract

One main challenge in structural health monitoring is distinguishing between the effects of actual system changes and changing environmental conditions (EC) on the monitored parameters. For this, data normalisation can be performed. Through the utilisation of Gaussian process (GP) regression, it is possible to map the influences of the ECs on the monitored parameters and simultaneously obtain confidence intervals of the predictions. The assumption of standard GPs is homoscedasticity, meaning a constant noise variance of the parameters. However, there is still a lack of research regarding the correctness of this assumption for different types of structures and damage sensitive features. Furthermore, the potential of normalisation techniques that enable the consideration of EC-dependent uncertainties should be analysed. In this real-world case study, damage detectability is investigated using GPs and eigenfrequencies. In contrast to standard homoscedastic GPs, heteroscedastic GPs can account for input-dependent uncertainties. Both methods are compared using real data from a lattice tower. Firstly, it is shown that the homoscedastic assumption does not hold for the eigenfrequencies of the lattice tower. Consequently, the heteroscedastic GPs enable more reliable damage detection than homoscedastic GPs when using a probabilistic novelty metric. Also, in the heteroscedastic case, the additional information on the uncertainty of the prediction increases the interpretability of the results.

Research and Review Journal of Nondestructive TestingVol. 2(2)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
0.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detectability of Structural Damage to a Lattice Tower using Eigenfrequencies and Gaussian Process Regression — Clemens Jonscher, Tanja Grießmann, et al. · Research and Review Journal of Nondestructive Testing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS