Validation of the German work-related basic need satisfaction scale (W-BNS-G)

Abstract Currently, there is no validated German tool that captures the basic needs as outlined in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) in the organizational context. To be able to collect reliable and valid data for research and use the results of German research on SDT to derive and implement empirically grounded practical implications that foster employee well-being, performance, and companies’ growth, a validated measurement tool is a compulsory requirement. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. (W-BNS). We replicated the three-factor structure, as well as the reliability of the three subscales and could extensively confirm the construct- and the criterion-related validity of the original W-BNS for the German version (W-BNS-G, N = 648). Additionally, multi-group comparisons were conducted to investigate cultural measurement invariance with the Dutch and the Italian version of the W-BNS. In summary, the present study provides a tool with high reliability and validity assessing the basic needin the organizational context in German language. We address the potential comparability of German, Italian, and Dutch findings using the different versions of the W-BNS and conclude by discussing the limitations of the present study and deriving suggestions for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06927-0
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the German work-related basic need satisfaction scale (W-BNS-G)

Eva Lermer, Anja Van den Broeck, Rossella Falvo, Matthias F. C. Hudecek et al.
2 citations
Current Psychology
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
1.29
article

Validation of the German work-related basic need satisfaction scale (W-BNS-G)

Eva Lermer, Anja Van den Broeck, Rossella Falvo, Matthias F. C. Hudecek, Daiana Colledani, Klara Grünwald
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Currently, there is no validated German tool that captures the basic needs as outlined in Self-Determination Theory (SDT) in the organizational context. To be able to collect reliable and valid data for research and use the results of German research on SDT to derive and implement empirically grounded practical implications that foster employee well-being, performance, and companies’ growth, a validated measurement tool is a compulsory requirement. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. (W-BNS). We replicated the three-factor structure, as well as the reliability of the three subscales and could extensively confirm the construct- and the criterion-related validity of the original W-BNS for the German version (W-BNS-G, N = 648). Additionally, multi-group comparisons were conducted to investigate cultural measurement invariance with the Dutch and the Italian version of the W-BNS. In summary, the present study provides a tool with high reliability and validity assessing the basic needin the organizational context in German language. We address the potential comparability of German, Italian, and Dutch findings using the different versions of the W-BNS and conclude by discussing the limitations of the present study and deriving suggestions for future research.

Current PsychologyVol. 43(47)
University of Padua (IT), Technische Hochschule Augsburg (DE), University of St.Gallen (CH), North-West University (ZA), FHNW University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (CH), University of Regensburg (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE), Sapienza University of Rome (IT), KU Leuven (BE)
Universität Regensburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.