Flexible working and well-being: evidence from the UK

Abstract Recent technological advancements have facilitated alternative work arrangements. This paper investigates how flextime and working from home (WfH) relate to workers’ well-being using longitudinal data drawn from the Understanding Society study for the UK. It accounts for individual, job, and family characteristics while controlling for individual fixed effects. Additionally, it employs the Oster test to examine the potential influence of unobserved variables. Results show that men experience improved job satisfaction and mental health with flextime arrangements, while women predominantly benefit in terms of job satisfaction. Additionally, women adopting remote work report heightened satisfaction with job and life, and better mental health, whereas men primarily report greater job satisfaction. Interestingly, flextime effects are stronger for men, while WfH is more beneficial for women. Some heterogeneous effects are also found by parental status, age, and income groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Demographic Economics
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/dem.2024.16
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flexible working and well-being: evidence from the UK

Margherita Agnoletto
5 citations
Journal of Demographic Economics
Employment and Welfare Studies
4.25
article

Flexible working and well-being: evidence from the UK

Margherita Agnoletto
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Recent technological advancements have facilitated alternative work arrangements. This paper investigates how flextime and working from home (WfH) relate to workers’ well-being using longitudinal data drawn from the Understanding Society study for the UK. It accounts for individual, job, and family characteristics while controlling for individual fixed effects. Additionally, it employs the Oster test to examine the potential influence of unobserved variables. Results show that men experience improved job satisfaction and mental health with flextime arrangements, while women predominantly benefit in terms of job satisfaction. Additionally, women adopting remote work report heightened satisfaction with job and life, and better mental health, whereas men primarily report greater job satisfaction. Interestingly, flextime effects are stronger for men, while WfH is more beneficial for women. Some heterogeneous effects are also found by parental status, age, and income groups.

Journal of Demographic EconomicsVol. 90(4)
Collegio Carlo Alberto (IT), University of Turin (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Employment and Welfare Studies
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Flexible working and well-being: evidence from the UK — Margherita Agnoletto · Journal of Demographic Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS