The Designer’s Dilemma 2.0: Visual-ness and <i>Canadian Theatre Review</i>

This article is a brief overview of the fifty-year relationship between scenography/design and Canadian Theatre Review ( CTR). In the past and given the journal’s (necessary?) privileging of text, this relationship has, at times, been fraught, perhaps even non-existent. The essay problematizes ‘scenography’ by recognizing that with very few exceptions, there are very few self-identifying scenographers to be found within the pages of CTR or working in Canadian theatre. This has led to concerns of representation, for when the journal has focused its attention on the visual, scenographers and designers have often responded in ways that downplay the creative, the collaborative, and the thoughtful and embrace the pragmatic. Despite the many challenges of capturing scenography/design in a two-dimensional journal, CTR has demonstrated great leadership in expanding the understanding of how theatre is defined. Scenography/design has greatly benefited from this more inclusive approach to understanding performance

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Theatre Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/ctr.200.003
Primary Topic
Canadian Identity and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Designer’s Dilemma 2.0: Visual-ness and Canadian Theatre Review

Canadian Theatre Review
Canadian Identity and History
article

The Designer’s Dilemma 2.0: Visual-ness and Canadian Theatre Review

article en

Abstract

This article is a brief overview of the fifty-year relationship between scenography/design and Canadian Theatre Review ( CTR). In the past and given the journal’s (necessary?) privileging of text, this relationship has, at times, been fraught, perhaps even non-existent. The essay problematizes ‘scenography’ by recognizing that with very few exceptions, there are very few self-identifying scenographers to be found within the pages of CTR or working in Canadian theatre. This has led to concerns of representation, for when the journal has focused its attention on the visual, scenographers and designers have often responded in ways that downplay the creative, the collaborative, and the thoughtful and embrace the pragmatic. Despite the many challenges of capturing scenography/design in a two-dimensional journal, CTR has demonstrated great leadership in expanding the understanding of how theatre is defined. Scenography/design has greatly benefited from this more inclusive approach to understanding performance

Canadian Theatre ReviewVol. 199-200
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Canadian Identity and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.