A taxa de fiscalização de exploração de recursos minerários no estado do Pará e a utilização do produto da sua arrecadação. Reflexões à luz da Constituição Federal

This essay aims to reignite the debate over the allocation of revenue from the Fee for Control, Monitoring, and Supervision of Mineral Research, Mining, Exploration, and Exploitation Activities (TFRM), established by Pará State Law nº 7,591/2011. The primary focus is on the flexibility of using TFRM revenue beyond its original purpose. The discussion emphasizes the challenges excessive revenue earmarking presents for public management and references Brazilian case law, highlighting the non-mandatory nature of such linkages, except in cases explicitly defined by law, like judicial fees. Although the Brazilian Constitution prohibits earmarking tax revenue, it does not impose the same restriction on fees unless specifically legislated. Drawing on Supreme Court decisions, this analysis questions the automatic presumption that fee revenue must fund the specific public services that justify their collection.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado do Pará
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52028/mpcpa.v02.i04-art06.pr
Primary Topic
Brazilian Legal Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A taxa de fiscalização de exploração de recursos minerários no estado do Pará e a utilização do produto da sua arrecadação. Reflexões à luz da Constituição Federal

G. Salgado
Revista do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado do Pará
Brazilian Legal Issues
article

A taxa de fiscalização de exploração de recursos minerários no estado do Pará e a utilização do produto da sua arrecadação. Reflexões à luz da Constituição Federal

G. Salgado
article en

Abstract

This essay aims to reignite the debate over the allocation of revenue from the Fee for Control, Monitoring, and Supervision of Mineral Research, Mining, Exploration, and Exploitation Activities (TFRM), established by Pará State Law nº 7,591/2011. The primary focus is on the flexibility of using TFRM revenue beyond its original purpose. The discussion emphasizes the challenges excessive revenue earmarking presents for public management and references Brazilian case law, highlighting the non-mandatory nature of such linkages, except in cases explicitly defined by law, like judicial fees. Although the Brazilian Constitution prohibits earmarking tax revenue, it does not impose the same restriction on fees unless specifically legislated. Drawing on Supreme Court decisions, this analysis questions the automatic presumption that fee revenue must fund the specific public services that justify their collection.

Revista do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado do ParáVol. 02(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Brazilian Legal Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A taxa de fiscalização de exploração de recursos minerários no estado do Pará e a utilização do produto da sua arrecadação. Reflexões à luz da Constituição Federal — G. Salgado · Revista do Ministério Público de Contas do Estado do Pará (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS