Developing the Chemical Equilibrium-Scientific Habits of Mind Scale: Validity and Reliability Analysis

One of the challenges of the 21st century disruption era is the fast development of science and technology which was initiated by the hard work of scientists who have habits of mind. Habits of mind can be deepened into scientific habits of mind (SHOM) and can be encouraged to be used by students at the high school level. This research aims to develop and validate the SHOM questionnaire in chemical equilibrium. Modified 4D becomes an adapted development model. The questionnaire developed has 25 statement items originating from seven aspects of SHOM. Content validity was calculated using the Aiken V equation and involved seven expert judgments with 4 categories of answer choices and produced an average of 0.90, so the questionnaire tested content validity. Construct validity was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient involving 300 respondents from 7 public high schools and produced a mean of 0.581 which was above the r table (r table value = 0.113), thus meeting the construct validity criteria. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach Alpha and got a mean score of 0.915 and the reliability was included in the very high category. Based on these findings, the SHOM questionnaire developed can be declared suitable for measuring SHOM for high school students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v12i2.77612
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing the Chemical Equilibrium-Scientific Habits of Mind Scale: Validity and Reliability Analysis

Eli Rohaeti, Endang Widjajanti Laksono, Faiz Ilham Pratama, Puspita Amalia
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Developing the Chemical Equilibrium-Scientific Habits of Mind Scale: Validity and Reliability Analysis

Eli Rohaeti, Endang Widjajanti Laksono, Faiz Ilham Pratama, Puspita Amalia
article en

Abstract

One of the challenges of the 21st century disruption era is the fast development of science and technology which was initiated by the hard work of scientists who have habits of mind. Habits of mind can be deepened into scientific habits of mind (SHOM) and can be encouraged to be used by students at the high school level. This research aims to develop and validate the SHOM questionnaire in chemical equilibrium. Modified 4D becomes an adapted development model. The questionnaire developed has 25 statement items originating from seven aspects of SHOM. Content validity was calculated using the Aiken V equation and involved seven expert judgments with 4 categories of answer choices and produced an average of 0.90, so the questionnaire tested content validity. Construct validity was calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient involving 300 respondents from 7 public high schools and produced a mean of 0.581 which was above the r table (r table value = 0.113), thus meeting the construct validity criteria. The reliability of the questionnaire was calculated using Cronbach Alpha and got a mean score of 0.915 and the reliability was included in the very high category. Based on these findings, the SHOM questionnaire developed can be declared suitable for measuring SHOM for high school students.

Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan SainsVol. 12(2)
Yogyakarta State University (ID)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.