What lessons, if any, do students infer from their studies of the Holocaust?

Abstract This paper reports on a study analysing the lessons that 15 A Level (aged 17–18) students inferred from their studies of the Holocaust. All the participants had studied the Holocaust at an advanced level. The participants were interviewed in small groups (three to five participants), with the transcriptions of those interviews being iteratively coded, adopting an inductive grounded theory approach. Results were highly varied, with many different types of lessons being considered, though the most common concerned antiracist lessons, lessons about state systems and lessons about human nature. There was a tendency amongst participants to focus less on moral/deontological lessons from the Holocaust, and more on ontological lessons. Participants independently identified the types of lessons that Holocaust education organisations (IHRA, 2022) and some theorists (Short, 1999, 2003) suggested/hoped that they might. The small sample size and dominance of certain participants should be noted as barriers to the generalisability of the findings reported here.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Curriculum Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.312
Primary Topic
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What lessons, if any, do students infer from their studies of the Holocaust?

Dan Nuttall
The Curriculum Journal
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
article

What lessons, if any, do students infer from their studies of the Holocaust?

Dan Nuttall
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper reports on a study analysing the lessons that 15 A Level (aged 17–18) students inferred from their studies of the Holocaust. All the participants had studied the Holocaust at an advanced level. The participants were interviewed in small groups (three to five participants), with the transcriptions of those interviews being iteratively coded, adopting an inductive grounded theory approach. Results were highly varied, with many different types of lessons being considered, though the most common concerned antiracist lessons, lessons about state systems and lessons about human nature. There was a tendency amongst participants to focus less on moral/deontological lessons from the Holocaust, and more on ontological lessons. Participants independently identified the types of lessons that Holocaust education organisations (IHRA, 2022) and some theorists (Short, 1999, 2003) suggested/hoped that they might. The small sample size and dominance of certain participants should be noted as barriers to the generalisability of the findings reported here.

The Curriculum JournalVol. 36(4)
IEEE Computer Society (US), University College London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What lessons, if any, do students infer from their studies of the Holocaust? — Dan Nuttall · The Curriculum Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS