Evaluating environmental impacts of micro, mini and small hydropower plants in Norway

Small-scale hydropower plants with an installed capacity <10 MW are an important part of Norway's local and regional development. Small-scale facilities have been viewed as a relatively environmentally friendly form of energy production because they are assumed to have limited negative environmental impact. However, the plants potentially have environmental impacts related to land use changes from infrastructure installation and also instream effects such as barriers to fish migration or disturbed flow conditions within bypasses. We used a remote sensing and GIS approach to examine the relative environmental impacts of three different size classes of Norwegian small-scale plants - categorized as micro (<0.1 MW), mini (0.1-1 MW) and small (1-10 MW). We evaluated 148 small-scale hydropower projects in Trøndelag, central Norway, focusing on their footprint and potential environmental impacts. Our analysis showed a slight preference for siting in forested habitat and, in particular, forested gorges associated with high biodiversity. However, most hydropower plants were not sited in forested gorges, or in areas with high predicted intensities of threatened terrestrial species. Similarly, there was little overlap with known migratory paths of Atlantic salmon and sea trout, or with archived occurrence records of instream fishes: salmon, trout or European eel. A low degree of overlap was attributed to the limited number of projects compared to the extensive distribution of these fish populations. The footprint areas of the projects were small (<4 ha) but increased with the size of the hydropower plants. Individual micro plants likely had low impact within their footprint because they required the least infrastructure for installation, and lacked dams which may act as barriers to fish movements. However, small plants were more land-use efficient. Our findings suggest that all size classes of small-scale hydropower plant have a role in balancing Norway's goals of minimizing environmental impacts of energy production while contributing to local and regional development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123521
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating environmental impacts of micro, mini and small hydropower plants in Norway

Richard David Hedger, Brett K. Sandercock, Tor Haakon Bakken, Mahmoud Saber Rafaei Kenawi et al.
15 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
3.02
article

Evaluating environmental impacts of micro, mini and small hydropower plants in Norway

Richard David Hedger, Brett K. Sandercock, Tor Haakon Bakken, Mahmoud Saber Rafaei Kenawi, Line Elisabeth Sundt-Hansen
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Small-scale hydropower plants with an installed capacity <10 MW are an important part of Norway's local and regional development. Small-scale facilities have been viewed as a relatively environmentally friendly form of energy production because they are assumed to have limited negative environmental impact. However, the plants potentially have environmental impacts related to land use changes from infrastructure installation and also instream effects such as barriers to fish migration or disturbed flow conditions within bypasses. We used a remote sensing and GIS approach to examine the relative environmental impacts of three different size classes of Norwegian small-scale plants - categorized as micro (<0.1 MW), mini (0.1-1 MW) and small (1-10 MW). We evaluated 148 small-scale hydropower projects in Trøndelag, central Norway, focusing on their footprint and potential environmental impacts. Our analysis showed a slight preference for siting in forested habitat and, in particular, forested gorges associated with high biodiversity. However, most hydropower plants were not sited in forested gorges, or in areas with high predicted intensities of threatened terrestrial species. Similarly, there was little overlap with known migratory paths of Atlantic salmon and sea trout, or with archived occurrence records of instream fishes: salmon, trout or European eel. A low degree of overlap was attributed to the limited number of projects compared to the extensive distribution of these fish populations. The footprint areas of the projects were small (<4 ha) but increased with the size of the hydropower plants. Individual micro plants likely had low impact within their footprint because they required the least infrastructure for installation, and lacked dams which may act as barriers to fish movements. However, small plants were more land-use efficient. Our findings suggest that all size classes of small-scale hydropower plant have a role in balancing Norway's goals of minimizing environmental impacts of energy production while contributing to local and regional development.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 373
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.