Ecological indicators for restoration success: Development of fish diversity in a large restored floodplain over twelve years

• Fish community was monitored in a large restored Danube floodplain over 12 years. • Colonisation patterns and population development strongly depended on life history. • Habitat- and species-dependent indicators of restoration success were established. • Floodplain restoration is important to compensate for habitat loss of the main stem. • Only long-term monitoring covered full population development of target species. The restoration of rivers and their floodplains is complex, requires substantial financial efforts, intensive stakeholder involvement and long recovery times, making the identification of appropriate ecological indicators for restoration success a key challenge. Herein, one of the largest floodplain restorations along the European Danube was repeatedly assessed over a 12-year period. Changes in the fish community composition in relation to chemical and morphological habitat variables were assessed in all three restored habitat types free-flowing rivers (RS), reconnected oxbows (OS), and small floodplain ponds (FP) which are only temporarily connected to the main stem Danube. Fish species composition of RS, OS, FP and the Danube differed significantly. Species numbers (34 detected in 2022) remained largely constant since the last monitoring in 2013, whereas abundance increased by 15%. Small-bodied target species with short generation times were able to establish populations comprising all size classes shortly after restoration, whilst large-bodied species needed a decade after the restoration for full demographic representation. Highly specialised species such as the rheophilic Chondrostoma nasus used restored RS only during the life stages spawning and juvenile growth. Restoration increased habitat heterogeneity and the initialized hydromorphological processes are still ongoing, supporting the high species diversity. The observed differences in colonization patterns can be explained by species-specific life histories, resulting in diverse short and long-term responses of different fish species and life stages following restoration. Consequently, a comprehensive assessment of restoration success only becomes possible if multiple fish species as ecological indicators are combined in a long-term monitoring.