Digit‐in‐Noise Test as a Hearing Screening Test for Individuals With Intellectual Disability

Our findings highlight the DIN(2) as the most effective version, as its signal-to-noise ratio (SRTn) threshold was closest to the typically developed (TD) control group. This study is the first step towards developing a hearing screening test for individuals with ID who are at elevated risk of impairment and who have insufficient evaluation access. Our findings suggest that adults with mild to moderate ID can sufficiently perform the adapted DIN(2) as a hearing screening test.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13205
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digit‐in‐Noise Test as a Hearing Screening Test for Individuals With Intellectual Disability

Ronit Saban‐Bezalel, Leah Fostick, Noa Shmerler
1 citations
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
0.34
article

Digit‐in‐Noise Test as a Hearing Screening Test for Individuals With Intellectual Disability

Ronit Saban‐Bezalel, Leah Fostick, Noa Shmerler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Our findings highlight the DIN(2) as the most effective version, as its signal-to-noise ratio (SRTn) threshold was closest to the typically developed (TD) control group. This study is the first step towards developing a hearing screening test for individuals with ID who are at elevated risk of impairment and who have insufficient evaluation access. Our findings suggest that adults with mild to moderate ID can sufficiently perform the adapted DIN(2) as a hearing screening test.

Journal of Intellectual Disability ResearchVol. 69(3)
Ariel University (IL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.