Nutritional profiling of plant‐based meat alternatives and ground beef

The objective of this study was to characterize the nutritional profile of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMA) and ground beef (GB). Beyond Beef (BEY); Impossible Burger (IMP), a third available product of plant-based protein, including SWEET EARTH, Incogmeato, Open Nature, and Good & Gather (GEN); and two lean levels of GB (regular [80%-85% lean, regular ground beef] and Lean [>93% lean, lean ground beef, LGB]) were purchased from retail stores across the United States. Proximate composition, mineral content, fatty acid profile, amino acid profile, and B-vitamin content were measured in raw products. Generally, PBMA had increased ash content which coincided with increased mineral concentration compared to GB, namely sodium, calcium, and zinc (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed for B-vitamins. The fatty acid profile of IMP was primarily saturated due to lauric acid (12:0) and myristic acid (14:0) concentrations. Both BEY and GEN were highly unsaturated because of linoleic acid concentration (18:2n6). LGB possessed the greatest total amino acid concentration and total essential amino acid content (p < 0.05). Phenylalanine was increased in PBMA compared to GB (p < 0.05). Overall, these data show differences and similarities between the nutritional profile of PBMA and GB. However, the bioavailability of these nutrients and associated health outcomes, particularly in PBMA, require further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.17579
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutritional profiling of plant‐based meat alternatives and ground beef

Matthew G. Siebecker, Katherine Coyle, Jerrad F. Legako, M. Sebastian Hernandez et al.
4 citations
Journal of Food Science
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.84
article

Nutritional profiling of plant‐based meat alternatives and ground beef

Matthew G. Siebecker, Katherine Coyle, Jerrad F. Legako, M. Sebastian Hernandez, Dale R. Woerner, J. Chance Brooks
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the nutritional profile of plant-based meat alternatives (PBMA) and ground beef (GB). Beyond Beef (BEY); Impossible Burger (IMP), a third available product of plant-based protein, including SWEET EARTH, Incogmeato, Open Nature, and Good & Gather (GEN); and two lean levels of GB (regular [80%-85% lean, regular ground beef] and Lean [>93% lean, lean ground beef, LGB]) were purchased from retail stores across the United States. Proximate composition, mineral content, fatty acid profile, amino acid profile, and B-vitamin content were measured in raw products. Generally, PBMA had increased ash content which coincided with increased mineral concentration compared to GB, namely sodium, calcium, and zinc (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed for B-vitamins. The fatty acid profile of IMP was primarily saturated due to lauric acid (12:0) and myristic acid (14:0) concentrations. Both BEY and GEN were highly unsaturated because of linoleic acid concentration (18:2n6). LGB possessed the greatest total amino acid concentration and total essential amino acid content (p < 0.05). Phenylalanine was increased in PBMA compared to GB (p < 0.05). Overall, these data show differences and similarities between the nutritional profile of PBMA and GB. However, the bioavailability of these nutrients and associated health outcomes, particularly in PBMA, require further investigation.

Journal of Food ScienceVol. 89(12)
Texas Tech University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
1.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.