The Evolution of the Design, Evaluation, Implementation and Monitoring of Standalone Screens

Abstract This paper aims to comprehensively introduce the historical, present, and future landscape of standalone screens’ design, and evaluation. The evolution of sand control screen design, testing, and implementation is explored, with a focus on its role in overcoming the challenges posed by heterogeneous geological formations and complex EOR strategies. Field case data will be used to illuminate the need for a more scientific approach to sand control engineering. As operators venture into increasingly complex and heterogeneous formations, precise sand control engineering becomes imperative. This paper will delve into the historical standalone screen design, highlighting its advantages and drawbacks. Through field case examples, we will underscore the necessity for a more scientific approach. A comprehensive sand control design cycle—from information acquisition and lab testing to data analytics, manufacturing, field installation, monitoring, and post-performance analysis—will be elucidated. Since 2017, the first attempt to optimize the standalone screen design has led to the development of a sand control best practice. The best practice outlines the guidelines and steps that must be followed on the sand control design, evaluation, and monitoring for future pads. The guidelines have been successfully implemented in the field with remarkable success and no failure to report to date. The guidelines specify the sampling method, the testing requirement to identify the sand variation within the studied sandbox, and selection criteria and evaluation testing through sand retention testing. The guidelines specify the manufacturing tolerances for each screen type. Additionally, the monitoring details for wells completed with sand control and adjustment of the best practices based on the monitoring data are outlined in the guidelines. This paper shares the rich history and lessons learned from sand control design from two fields where different standalone screens are used as the primary completion method. Designing and optimizing the sand control screens for wells is a formidable challenge, given the intricate nature of downhole environments. This paper conveys lessons and learns from field case studies to the industry, shedding light on the complexities and offering guidance for future sand screen engineering. The insights shared aim to contribute to the continuous improvement and advancement of sand control practices in the global hydrocarbon recovery sector.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2118/223062-ms
Citations
2
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evolution of the Design, Evaluation, Implementation and Monitoring of Standalone Screens

Fernando Gaviria, Morteza Roostaei, Mahdi Mahmoudi, Da Zhu et al.
2 citations
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
1.67
article

The Evolution of the Design, Evaluation, Implementation and Monitoring of Standalone Screens

Fernando Gaviria, Morteza Roostaei, Mahdi Mahmoudi, Da Zhu, Kome Eto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to comprehensively introduce the historical, present, and future landscape of standalone screens’ design, and evaluation. The evolution of sand control screen design, testing, and implementation is explored, with a focus on its role in overcoming the challenges posed by heterogeneous geological formations and complex EOR strategies. Field case data will be used to illuminate the need for a more scientific approach to sand control engineering. As operators venture into increasingly complex and heterogeneous formations, precise sand control engineering becomes imperative. This paper will delve into the historical standalone screen design, highlighting its advantages and drawbacks. Through field case examples, we will underscore the necessity for a more scientific approach. A comprehensive sand control design cycle—from information acquisition and lab testing to data analytics, manufacturing, field installation, monitoring, and post-performance analysis—will be elucidated. Since 2017, the first attempt to optimize the standalone screen design has led to the development of a sand control best practice. The best practice outlines the guidelines and steps that must be followed on the sand control design, evaluation, and monitoring for future pads. The guidelines have been successfully implemented in the field with remarkable success and no failure to report to date. The guidelines specify the sampling method, the testing requirement to identify the sand variation within the studied sandbox, and selection criteria and evaluation testing through sand retention testing. The guidelines specify the manufacturing tolerances for each screen type. Additionally, the monitoring details for wells completed with sand control and adjustment of the best practices based on the monitoring data are outlined in the guidelines. This paper shares the rich history and lessons learned from sand control design from two fields where different standalone screens are used as the primary completion method. Designing and optimizing the sand control screens for wells is a formidable challenge, given the intricate nature of downhole environments. This paper conveys lessons and learns from field case studies to the industry, shedding light on the complexities and offering guidance for future sand screen engineering. The insights shared aim to contribute to the continuous improvement and advancement of sand control practices in the global hydrocarbon recovery sector.

Suncor Energy (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.