Techno‐Economic and Agricultural Best Practices for Increasing the Efficiency of Bioenergy Companies: Mixed Method for the Optimization of Land Use in Brazil and Australia

ABSTRACT This study proposes techno‐economic and agricultural best practices for increasing the efficiency of bioenergy companies. A mixed method was developed for increasing efficiency through the application of a two‐stage data envelopment analysis (DEA), followed by a multiple case study. The efficiency concept model was based on the capacity of a sugarcane grower to maximize the production of sugarcane per planted area, while minimizing the generation of mineral and vegetable impurities. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the variables that exerted a major influence on the performance of the bioenergy companies. The quantitative approach developed here pointed to the identification of six variables that served as the basis for the qualitative stage of this research project. Through qualitative analysis, five other relevant variables were identified: cultivation activities, sugarcane renewal, edaphoclimatic factors, sugarcane genetic variety, and irrigation systems. Based on the identified variables, multiple case studies were conducted in Brazil and Australia to identify best practices that should yield superior results in terms of techno‐economic and agricultural efficiency. One hundred best practices were identified and grouped according to the stages of the sugarcane production process and each category of technology, agricultural, and management practices. Most best practices were related to two specific stages of the sugarcane production process: (i) crop development and (ii) harvesting. Although Australia presented a greater concentration of best technology and agricultural practices, Brazil presented a greater concentration of best management practices, highlighting the potential and characteristics of each producing region. Thus, the results provide fundamental information for managers to make decisions and prioritize key factors that contribute most significantly to increasing the agricultural productivity of planted areas. Finally, as a practical contribution, a free online platform was developed for self‐assessment of adherence to best practices by growers and an implementation methodology to increase efficiency in sugarcane production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.4063
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno‐Economic and Agricultural Best Practices for Increasing the Efficiency of Bioenergy Companies: Mixed Method for the Optimization of Land Use in Brazil and Australia

Stephen E. Saddow, Perla Calil Pongeluppe Wadhy Rebehy, Fábio Vogelaar Carlucci, Juliana Chiaretti Novi et al.
2 citations
Business Strategy and the Environment
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.41
article

Techno‐Economic and Agricultural Best Practices for Increasing the Efficiency of Bioenergy Companies: Mixed Method for the Optimization of Land Use in Brazil and Australia

Stephen E. Saddow, Perla Calil Pongeluppe Wadhy Rebehy, Fábio Vogelaar Carlucci, Juliana Chiaretti Novi, Stella Vannucci Lemos, Alexandre Pereira Salgado
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study proposes techno‐economic and agricultural best practices for increasing the efficiency of bioenergy companies. A mixed method was developed for increasing efficiency through the application of a two‐stage data envelopment analysis (DEA), followed by a multiple case study. The efficiency concept model was based on the capacity of a sugarcane grower to maximize the production of sugarcane per planted area, while minimizing the generation of mineral and vegetable impurities. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify the variables that exerted a major influence on the performance of the bioenergy companies. The quantitative approach developed here pointed to the identification of six variables that served as the basis for the qualitative stage of this research project. Through qualitative analysis, five other relevant variables were identified: cultivation activities, sugarcane renewal, edaphoclimatic factors, sugarcane genetic variety, and irrigation systems. Based on the identified variables, multiple case studies were conducted in Brazil and Australia to identify best practices that should yield superior results in terms of techno‐economic and agricultural efficiency. One hundred best practices were identified and grouped according to the stages of the sugarcane production process and each category of technology, agricultural, and management practices. Most best practices were related to two specific stages of the sugarcane production process: (i) crop development and (ii) harvesting. Although Australia presented a greater concentration of best technology and agricultural practices, Brazil presented a greater concentration of best management practices, highlighting the potential and characteristics of each producing region. Thus, the results provide fundamental information for managers to make decisions and prioritize key factors that contribute most significantly to increasing the agricultural productivity of planted areas. Finally, as a practical contribution, a free online platform was developed for self‐assessment of adherence to best practices by growers and an implementation methodology to increase efficiency in sugarcane production.

Business Strategy and the EnvironmentVol. 34(2)
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), University of South Florida (US), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.