Improving Access to Justice for Women Who Kill Their Abusers: Practitioner Insights and Experiences

Over the past decade, Australia has made significant reforms aimed at improving legal understandings of intimate partner violence, women’s use of force and their access to self-defence. While some courts have recognised the cumulative effects of coercive control and social entrapment on women’s responses, significant problems remain that deny many women access to justice. This article presents findings from a Victorian pilot study involving interviews with lawyers and experts who work with victim-survivors in these cases. Results revealed that a number of interviewees had limited knowledge of the family violence legislation. While psych-based expertise was seen as helpful, this tended to be in limited ways. Interviewees emphasised both the challenges accessing, and limited authority afforded, family violence experts/expertise by the courts. We conclude with recommendations for building the workforce and capacity of experts to work in this area and targeted training to skill up practitioners to more effectively utilise the family violence evidence provisions throughout the whole court process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.3739
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Access to Justice for Women Who Kill Their Abusers: Practitioner Insights and Experiences

Bronwyn Naylor, Stella Tarrant, Danielle Tyson
1 citations
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
0.53
article

Improving Access to Justice for Women Who Kill Their Abusers: Practitioner Insights and Experiences

Bronwyn Naylor, Stella Tarrant, Danielle Tyson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Over the past decade, Australia has made significant reforms aimed at improving legal understandings of intimate partner violence, women’s use of force and their access to self-defence. While some courts have recognised the cumulative effects of coercive control and social entrapment on women’s responses, significant problems remain that deny many women access to justice. This article presents findings from a Victorian pilot study involving interviews with lawyers and experts who work with victim-survivors in these cases. Results revealed that a number of interviewees had limited knowledge of the family violence legislation. While psych-based expertise was seen as helpful, this tended to be in limited ways. Interviewees emphasised both the challenges accessing, and limited authority afforded, family violence experts/expertise by the courts. We conclude with recommendations for building the workforce and capacity of experts to work in this area and targeted training to skill up practitioners to more effectively utilise the family violence evidence provisions throughout the whole court process.

International Journal for Crime Justice and Social DemocracyVol. 13(4)
Deakin University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), MIT University (MK), RMIT University (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Improving Access to Justice for Women Who Kill Their Abusers: Practitioner Insights and Experiences — Bronwyn Naylor, Stella Tarrant, et al. · International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS