Aliaksei Kazharski: Central Europe Thirty Years after the Fall of Communism. A Return to the Margin?

Ondřej Slačálek reviews Aliaksei Kazharski´s new book. According to Slačálek, the book has many promising points of entry for understanding the (re)construction of “Central Europe” as a region, and understanding it from the East rather than (yet again) from the West. However, this potential is realized only partially. As the book does not take the region´s real historical marginality seriously, in it, Central Europe does not become marginal until it deviates from its alleged transition to or place in the supposed Western European mainstream. Slačálek sums up that the book can be read not only as a valuable scholarly contribution to the debate, but also as a document of its time: a time when (at least for many influential analysts) conservative nationalism could look like something that may be localized on the European “margins” and considered a re-creation of regionalized pathologies of Central Europe, while the western part may be characterized by a “universalist”, “liberal” and “humanitarian” stance. He concludes that this kind of analysis is also a biased construction that might belie the much more complex and richer reality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Czech Journal of International Relations
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32422/cjir.1646
Primary Topic
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aliaksei Kazharski: Central Europe Thirty Years after the Fall of Communism. A Return to the Margin?

Ondřej Slačálek
Czech Journal of International Relations
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
article

Aliaksei Kazharski: Central Europe Thirty Years after the Fall of Communism. A Return to the Margin?

Ondřej Slačálek
article en

Abstract

Ondřej Slačálek reviews Aliaksei Kazharski´s new book. According to Slačálek, the book has many promising points of entry for understanding the (re)construction of “Central Europe” as a region, and understanding it from the East rather than (yet again) from the West. However, this potential is realized only partially. As the book does not take the region´s real historical marginality seriously, in it, Central Europe does not become marginal until it deviates from its alleged transition to or place in the supposed Western European mainstream. Slačálek sums up that the book can be read not only as a valuable scholarly contribution to the debate, but also as a document of its time: a time when (at least for many influential analysts) conservative nationalism could look like something that may be localized on the European “margins” and considered a re-creation of regionalized pathologies of Central Europe, while the western part may be characterized by a “universalist”, “liberal” and “humanitarian” stance. He concludes that this kind of analysis is also a biased construction that might belie the much more complex and richer reality.

Czech Journal of International RelationsVol. 59(3)
Charles University (CZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Eastern European Communism and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Aliaksei Kazharski: Central Europe Thirty Years after the Fall of Communism. A Return to the Margin? — Ondřej Slačálek · Czech Journal of International Relations (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS