A Comparative Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomies

MIPD has been shown to have improved postoperative outcomes compared to OPD but is associated with longer operative times, which can be associated with increased complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27992
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomies

Norah N. Zaza, Catherine Valukas, Ryan P. Merkow, Dominic Vitello et al.
1 citations
Journal of Surgical Oncology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
0.28
article

A Comparative Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomies

Norah N. Zaza, Catherine Valukas, Ryan P. Merkow, Dominic Vitello, David D. Odell, David J. Bentrem
article en
1 citations

Abstract

MIPD has been shown to have improved postoperative outcomes compared to OPD but is associated with longer operative times, which can be associated with increased complications.

Journal of Surgical OncologyVol. 131(5)
University of Michigan (US), University of Chicago (US), Northwestern Medicine (US)
Northwestern University, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.