No pains no gains: understanding the impacts of physician efforts in online reviews on outpatient appointment

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of physician efforts in online reviews on outpatient appointments, while also examining the moderating effect of physician title. Design/methodology/approach This study employs the heuristic-systematic model (HSM) to analyze the impact of physician efforts on outpatient appointments. Subsequently, a fixed effect model is employed to examine the research model using an 89-week panel dataset (from April 16, 2018 to December 29, 2019) comprising appointment and online review information pertaining to 8,157 physicians from a prominent online health community in China. Findings The findings suggest that physicians with lower professional titles exhibit a significantly higher inclination to enhance heuristic information (e.g. attracting helpful votes) compared to those with higher professional title. All physicians can enhance their outpatient appointments by dedicating efforts towards improving systematic review information, but physician title would weaken the relationship. Moreover, the effect of increasing review volume is considerably more substantial than that of increasing review length, which also surpasses the influence of providing managerial response. Originality/value Unlike previous studies that primarily focus on patients’ perspectives, this paper represents one of the pioneering effects to examine physicians’ engagement in online reviews.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ajim-04-2024-0284
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No pains no gains: understanding the impacts of physician efforts in online reviews on outpatient appointment

Pengkun Wu, Liuan Wang, Yu Li, J Jiang
3 citations
Aslib Journal of Information Management
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
2.55
article

No pains no gains: understanding the impacts of physician efforts in online reviews on outpatient appointment

Pengkun Wu, Liuan Wang, Yu Li, J Jiang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the impact of physician efforts in online reviews on outpatient appointments, while also examining the moderating effect of physician title. Design/methodology/approach This study employs the heuristic-systematic model (HSM) to analyze the impact of physician efforts on outpatient appointments. Subsequently, a fixed effect model is employed to examine the research model using an 89-week panel dataset (from April 16, 2018 to December 29, 2019) comprising appointment and online review information pertaining to 8,157 physicians from a prominent online health community in China. Findings The findings suggest that physicians with lower professional titles exhibit a significantly higher inclination to enhance heuristic information (e.g. attracting helpful votes) compared to those with higher professional title. All physicians can enhance their outpatient appointments by dedicating efforts towards improving systematic review information, but physician title would weaken the relationship. Moreover, the effect of increasing review volume is considerably more substantial than that of increasing review length, which also surpasses the influence of providing managerial response. Originality/value Unlike previous studies that primarily focus on patients’ perspectives, this paper represents one of the pioneering effects to examine physicians’ engagement in online reviews.

Aslib Journal of Information Management
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Marion General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.