Geoscientist-driven machine learning-assisted fault interpretation: A case study from Atlanta Field to demonstrate the impact of fault labeling on the fault prediction cube

Abstract The energy industry is undergoing a digital transformation, leveraging cloud capabilities and artificial intelligence technology to overcome the challenges of conventional geoscience workflows. Machine learning (ML) methodologies have been developed and applied to various geophysical and geologic workflows, such as seismic processing, imaging, seismic interpretation, and petrophysical analysis. The traditional seismic interpretation approach requires manual interpretation of faults line by line at a fixed increment. Consequently, depending on the geologic complexity and size of the area of interest, the traditional approach can be a time-consuming and repetitive task. We focus on applying ML to seismic data for fault interpretation using a 2D convolutional neural network methodology to accelerate the fault interpretation process. This approach has the potential to significantly reduce the time and effort required to interpret faults, depending on the seismic data quality and geologic complexity, which is demonstrated by our study in the Atlanta Field, a postsalt asset in Brazil's northern Santos Basin. The basin has high structural complexity due to the salt tectonics, which required additional labeling interpretation to capture different fault patterns and train the algorithm to predict faults within the seismic volume. Additionally, the study provides the impact of the initial fault interpretation label on the ML result, such as in the fault extension and fault dip. Overall, the ML approach reduced the total effort from two weeks to four days, representing a time improvement of 60% from interpretation to structural framework workflow.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Leading Edge
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1190/tle43120828.1
Primary Topic
Geological Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geoscientist-driven machine learning-assisted fault interpretation: A case study from Atlanta Field to demonstrate the impact of fault labeling on the fault prediction cube

Hellen de Prá da Rosa, Alexandre Rodrigues de Souza, Guiomar Oliveira, Leonardo Bonato Félix et al.
The Leading Edge
Geological Modeling and Analysis
article

Geoscientist-driven machine learning-assisted fault interpretation: A case study from Atlanta Field to demonstrate the impact of fault labeling on the fault prediction cube

Hellen de Prá da Rosa, Alexandre Rodrigues de Souza, Guiomar Oliveira, Leonardo Bonato Félix, S. Manral, Mateus Ferreira, Caroline Martinez de Haeck
article en

Abstract

Abstract The energy industry is undergoing a digital transformation, leveraging cloud capabilities and artificial intelligence technology to overcome the challenges of conventional geoscience workflows. Machine learning (ML) methodologies have been developed and applied to various geophysical and geologic workflows, such as seismic processing, imaging, seismic interpretation, and petrophysical analysis. The traditional seismic interpretation approach requires manual interpretation of faults line by line at a fixed increment. Consequently, depending on the geologic complexity and size of the area of interest, the traditional approach can be a time-consuming and repetitive task. We focus on applying ML to seismic data for fault interpretation using a 2D convolutional neural network methodology to accelerate the fault interpretation process. This approach has the potential to significantly reduce the time and effort required to interpret faults, depending on the seismic data quality and geologic complexity, which is demonstrated by our study in the Atlanta Field, a postsalt asset in Brazil's northern Santos Basin. The basin has high structural complexity due to the salt tectonics, which required additional labeling interpretation to capture different fault patterns and train the algorithm to predict faults within the seismic volume. Additionally, the study provides the impact of the initial fault interpretation label on the ML result, such as in the fault extension and fault dip. Overall, the ML approach reduced the total effort from two weeks to four days, representing a time improvement of 60% from interpretation to structural framework workflow.

The Leading EdgeVol. 43(12)
École Nationale de la Statistique et de l'Analyse de l'Information (FR), SLB Médical (France) (FR), Google (United Kingdom) (GB), Silence Therapeutics (United Kingdom) (GB), Spectral Labs (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Geological Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.