The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy

The routine use of preoperative group and save (G&S) blood tests in emergency laparoscopic appendicectomies has been a standard yet often unquestioned practice. However, with the advancements in laparoscopic techniques and the low risk of intraoperative bleeding, is this precaution necessary? Analysing 276 emergency appendicectomy cases over a year, our study revealed that no transfusions were required due to surgical complications. Nevertheless, routine G&S testing causes considerable financial and resource strains, consuming valuable time and delaying treatment. These results question the value of this practice and suggest a need for reevaluation. Can we achieve better resource management while maintaining patient safety? By proposing targeted testing for high-risk individuals, this article sparks debate on optimising preoperative strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74898
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.38

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy

Umair Khan, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Vivek Chaudhari
2 citations
Cureus
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
1.38
article

The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy

Umair Khan, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, Vivek Chaudhari
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The routine use of preoperative group and save (G&S) blood tests in emergency laparoscopic appendicectomies has been a standard yet often unquestioned practice. However, with the advancements in laparoscopic techniques and the low risk of intraoperative bleeding, is this precaution necessary? Analysing 276 emergency appendicectomy cases over a year, our study revealed that no transfusions were required due to surgical complications. Nevertheless, routine G&S testing causes considerable financial and resource strains, consuming valuable time and delaying treatment. These results question the value of this practice and suggest a need for reevaluation. Can we achieve better resource management while maintaining patient safety? By proposing targeted testing for high-risk individuals, this article sparks debate on optimising preoperative strategies.

CureusVol. 16(12)
United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
1.38
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy — Umair Khan, Mohammad Anwar Hossain, et al. · Cureus (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS