Culturally responsive communication in generative AI: looking at ChatGPT’s advice for coming out

Abstract Generative AI has captured the public imagination as a tool that promises access to expertise beyond the technical jargon and expense that traditionally characterize such infospheres as those of medicine and law. Largely absent from the current literature, however, are interrogations of generative AI’s abilities to deal in culturally responsive communication, or the expertise interwoven with culturally aware, socially responsible, and personally sensitive communication best practices. To interrogate the possibilities of cultural responsiveness in generative AI, we examine the patterns of response that characterize ChatGPT-3.5’s advice for coming out. Specifically, we submitted 100 prompts soliciting coming out advice to GPT-3.5, variegating each of those prompts slightly to account for intersectional identities. From the analysis, we find that, while the responses are largely in-line with best practices, there are also instances that might represent problematics concerning the interpellation of the user or the persons to whom one is coming out.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI & Society
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02141-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Culturally responsive communication in generative AI: looking at ChatGPT’s advice for coming out

Daniel S. Strasser, Miles C. Coleman, Angela M. Cirucci, Evan Garaizar
1 citations
AI & Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

Culturally responsive communication in generative AI: looking at ChatGPT’s advice for coming out

Daniel S. Strasser, Miles C. Coleman, Angela M. Cirucci, Evan Garaizar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Generative AI has captured the public imagination as a tool that promises access to expertise beyond the technical jargon and expense that traditionally characterize such infospheres as those of medicine and law. Largely absent from the current literature, however, are interrogations of generative AI’s abilities to deal in culturally responsive communication, or the expertise interwoven with culturally aware, socially responsible, and personally sensitive communication best practices. To interrogate the possibilities of cultural responsiveness in generative AI, we examine the patterns of response that characterize ChatGPT-3.5’s advice for coming out. Specifically, we submitted 100 prompts soliciting coming out advice to GPT-3.5, variegating each of those prompts slightly to account for intersectional identities. From the analysis, we find that, while the responses are largely in-line with best practices, there are also instances that might represent problematics concerning the interpellation of the user or the persons to whom one is coming out.

AI & SocietyVol. 40(4)
Rowan University (US)
Rowan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Culturally responsive communication in generative AI: looking at ChatGPT’s advice for coming out — Daniel S. Strasser, Miles C. Coleman, et al. · AI & Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS