On the interrelationship of electrical and hydraulic conductivities in carbonate rocks

Carbonate reservoir exhibits "low-resistivity and (ultra) low-permeability" anomaly due to complex pore structure. It means that hydraulic conductivity, closely related to permeability ( K ), is not simply equivalent to electrical conductivity in this case. As a result, the conventionally well-established permeability-resistivity relationship does not apply to carbonate reservoirs any longer, and this poses a big challenge for the interpretation and evaluation of carbonate reservoirs. In this study, we found that the relationship between permeability and formation factor is non-monotonic and scattering through direct-current (DC) resistivity and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, and this means that the hydraulic conductivity is not well correlated with the electrical conductivity in carbonate rocks as one expects. There are the two factors, the volume fraction ratio of macro- and micro-pores, and the number of dolomitization-formed micropores, predominantly control hydraulic conductivity and electric conductivity, respectively. Moreover, the non-uniform distribution of intercrystalline pore networks will significantly reduce hydraulic conductivity. To more accurately estimate the permeability of carbonate rocks, the new permeability model based on NMR T 2 spectra rather than formation factor has been proposed. In this model, the characteristic relaxation time ( T 2 c = 83.418 m s ) was defined, which is associated with the macropores that contribute most significantly to permeability and can be used to distinguish between macro- and micro-pores. This model demonstrates a minimal average absolute logarithmic deviation ( d = 0.3667 ) and exhibits generalizability across various carbonate rocks. The study addresses the mechanism analysis of "low-resistivity and (ultra) low-permeability" phenomenon in carbonate reservoir, and has potential to facilitate the interpretation and evaluation of carbonate reservoir. • The ϕNMR_sat is the best choice for discussing the relationship between permeability and resistivity in carbonate rocks. • The hydraulic conductivity is primarily controlled by the porosity and the volume fraction ratio of macro-to micro-pores. • The electrical conductivity is mainly influenced by the number of intercrystalline micropores formed by dolomitization. • The new permeability model based on NMR T 2 spectra has the minimum average absolute logarithmic deviation. • The new permeability prediction model demonstrates generalizability across various types of carbonate rocks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213576
Primary Topic
NMR spectroscopy and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the interrelationship of electrical and hydraulic conductivities in carbonate rocks

Liubin Wei, Xiao Zengjia, Chunyu Wang, Zhi Li et al.
1 links
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
NMR spectroscopy and applications
article

On the interrelationship of electrical and hydraulic conductivities in carbonate rocks

Liubin Wei, Xiao Zengjia, Chunyu Wang, Zhi Li, Ren Junfeng, Fang Ouyang, Ming Ma, Sun Yangyang, Mao Yurong, Yan Bohong, Zhang Yu, Zhao Jianguo
article en

Abstract

Carbonate reservoir exhibits "low-resistivity and (ultra) low-permeability" anomaly due to complex pore structure. It means that hydraulic conductivity, closely related to permeability ( K ), is not simply equivalent to electrical conductivity in this case. As a result, the conventionally well-established permeability-resistivity relationship does not apply to carbonate reservoirs any longer, and this poses a big challenge for the interpretation and evaluation of carbonate reservoirs. In this study, we found that the relationship between permeability and formation factor is non-monotonic and scattering through direct-current (DC) resistivity and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments, and this means that the hydraulic conductivity is not well correlated with the electrical conductivity in carbonate rocks as one expects. There are the two factors, the volume fraction ratio of macro- and micro-pores, and the number of dolomitization-formed micropores, predominantly control hydraulic conductivity and electric conductivity, respectively. Moreover, the non-uniform distribution of intercrystalline pore networks will significantly reduce hydraulic conductivity. To more accurately estimate the permeability of carbonate rocks, the new permeability model based on NMR T 2 spectra rather than formation factor has been proposed. In this model, the characteristic relaxation time ( T 2 c = 83.418 m s ) was defined, which is associated with the macropores that contribute most significantly to permeability and can be used to distinguish between macro- and micro-pores. This model demonstrates a minimal average absolute logarithmic deviation ( d = 0.3667 ) and exhibits generalizability across various carbonate rocks. The study addresses the mechanism analysis of "low-resistivity and (ultra) low-permeability" phenomenon in carbonate reservoir, and has potential to facilitate the interpretation and evaluation of carbonate reservoir. • The ϕNMR_sat is the best choice for discussing the relationship between permeability and resistivity in carbonate rocks. • The hydraulic conductivity is primarily controlled by the porosity and the volume fraction ratio of macro-to micro-pores. • The electrical conductivity is mainly influenced by the number of intercrystalline micropores formed by dolomitization. • The new permeability model based on NMR T 2 spectra has the minimum average absolute logarithmic deviation. • The new permeability prediction model demonstrates generalizability across various types of carbonate rocks.

Geoenergy Science and EngineeringVol. 246
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
NMR spectroscopy and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.