Unlocking the Mysteries of Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Analysis of Lexical Bundles in L2 English for Engineering Students

This study examines the use of lexical bundles in reports produced by university-level L2 English writers in civil and environmental engineering (CEE). The corpus consists of 119 reports, and the study compares the use of different types of lexical bundles (3-word, 4-word, and 5-word) in high-scoring and low-scoring papers. The results show that high-scoring papers use a wider range of lexical bundles, and that the use of lexical bundles varies by discipline. The study also identifies specific features of the lexical bundles that contribute to score differences. The findings suggest that teaching lexical bundles and vocabulary can improve the academic writing of engineering students. The paper concludes by calling for further research on the impact of formulaic expressions on attainment scores in L2 writing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241299997
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unlocking the Mysteries of Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Analysis of Lexical Bundles in L2 English for Engineering Students

Hessah Saleh Aldayel, Barbara W.Y. Siu, Samantha M. Curle, Muhammad Afzaal
4 citations
SAGE Open
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
15.63
article

Unlocking the Mysteries of Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Analysis of Lexical Bundles in L2 English for Engineering Students

Hessah Saleh Aldayel, Barbara W.Y. Siu, Samantha M. Curle, Muhammad Afzaal
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study examines the use of lexical bundles in reports produced by university-level L2 English writers in civil and environmental engineering (CEE). The corpus consists of 119 reports, and the study compares the use of different types of lexical bundles (3-word, 4-word, and 5-word) in high-scoring and low-scoring papers. The results show that high-scoring papers use a wider range of lexical bundles, and that the use of lexical bundles varies by discipline. The study also identifies specific features of the lexical bundles that contribute to score differences. The findings suggest that teaching lexical bundles and vocabulary can improve the academic writing of engineering students. The paper concludes by calling for further research on the impact of formulaic expressions on attainment scores in L2 writing.

SAGE OpenVol. 14(4)
Shanghai International Studies University (CN), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), King Saud University (SA), University of Bath (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
15.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unlocking the Mysteries of Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Analysis of Lexical Bundles in L2 English for Engineering Students — Hessah Saleh Aldayel, Barbara W.Y. Siu, et al. · SAGE Open (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS