Doing “ethics work” in practice: An analysis of care managers’ collegial discussions concerning reluctant clients

Few studies have explored the moral and ethical dimensions of how, in practice, social workers talk about and handle cases as part of their daily work. At the same time, identifying and examining the ethical dimensions of actual social work practice can be challenging because ethics is often hidden within the complex particularities of daily work. This article applies and develops Sarah Banks’ conceptualisation of “ethics work” to examine how care managers in Sweden are “doing ethics”, while seeking and providing collegial support and guidance on how to deal with the wishes of adult (potential) service users who are reluctant to accept support – or whose wishes in the matter are difficult to determine. The study is based on an analysis of 14 audio-recorded case conferences. With the help of Banks’ conceptualisation, the analysis makes visible how the case discussions in question encompass a complex “doing of ethics”, by means of which the welfare of individuals is balanced against care managers’ legal duty to adhere, without exception, to the principle of self-determination. The findings suggest that further research that applies and develops Banks’ conceptualisation of ethics work by examining “actual” social work practice in situ, while recognising the particularities of the social and societal context in which this work is taking place, could provide new knowledge and understanding about both the specific and common challenges that social workers face in different parts of the world. It could also make the ethical dimensions of social work practice more widely recognised and valued.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Social Work
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250241303782
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doing “ethics work” in practice: An analysis of care managers’ collegial discussions concerning reluctant clients

Annika Taghizadeh Larsson, Anna Olaison, Johannes Österholm
Qualitative Social Work
Ethics in medical practice
article

Doing “ethics work” in practice: An analysis of care managers’ collegial discussions concerning reluctant clients

Annika Taghizadeh Larsson, Anna Olaison, Johannes Österholm
article en

Abstract

Few studies have explored the moral and ethical dimensions of how, in practice, social workers talk about and handle cases as part of their daily work. At the same time, identifying and examining the ethical dimensions of actual social work practice can be challenging because ethics is often hidden within the complex particularities of daily work. This article applies and develops Sarah Banks’ conceptualisation of “ethics work” to examine how care managers in Sweden are “doing ethics”, while seeking and providing collegial support and guidance on how to deal with the wishes of adult (potential) service users who are reluctant to accept support – or whose wishes in the matter are difficult to determine. The study is based on an analysis of 14 audio-recorded case conferences. With the help of Banks’ conceptualisation, the analysis makes visible how the case discussions in question encompass a complex “doing of ethics”, by means of which the welfare of individuals is balanced against care managers’ legal duty to adhere, without exception, to the principle of self-determination. The findings suggest that further research that applies and develops Banks’ conceptualisation of ethics work by examining “actual” social work practice in situ, while recognising the particularities of the social and societal context in which this work is taking place, could provide new knowledge and understanding about both the specific and common challenges that social workers face in different parts of the world. It could also make the ethical dimensions of social work practice more widely recognised and valued.

Qualitative Social WorkVol. 24(6)
Linköping University (SE)
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.