A Comparative Study Assessing the Confidence of Doctors in Conventional vs Artificial Intelligence Assisted Radiological Diagnoses for Patient Care

Introduction: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into radiology has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, yet the confidence of doctors in AI-assisted diagnosis remains uncertain. AI's potential to streamline workflows and detect complex abnormalities is widely acknowledged, but skepticism persists regarding its reliability and the potential disruption of traditional radiological practices. This study aims to assess global doctors' confidence in AI-assisted radiology and explore factors influencing their acceptance of AI technologies. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey involved 384 doctors from diverse clinical settings worldwide. A self-administered questionnaire captured demographic data, confidence in AI versus conventional radiology, and perceptions of AI in clinical practice. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The majority of participants (66.7%) expressed higher confidence in conventional radiologist-led diagnoses compared to AI-assisted interpretations. Confidence in AI tools averaged 5.35/10, with limited AI training (16.9%) and lack of trust (13%) as the primary challenges. Participants with more experience reported greater confidence in interpreting radiographs independently and relied less on radiologists. Common challenges in conventional radiology included delays (35%) and limited access to radiologists (26%). AI was seen as beneficial for routine cases but not yet trusted for complex diagnoses, with only 36.7% believing it will eventually surpass human expertise. Conclusion: Doctors continue to favor conventional radiologist-led diagnostics over AI-assisted tools due to concerns about trust, reliability, and insufficient training. While AI holds potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing time constraints, widespread adoption requires overcoming significant barriers. Radiologists remain crucial in clinical decision-making, and AI will likely serve as a supplementary tool until confidence in its capabilities improves.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Emergency Medicine Open Access
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33140/jemoa.02.01.14
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study Assessing the Confidence of Doctors in Conventional vs Artificial Intelligence Assisted Radiological Diagnoses for Patient Care

Supriya Nair, S. Shah, Parth Patel, Armia George et al.
Journal of Emergency Medicine Open Access
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A Comparative Study Assessing the Confidence of Doctors in Conventional vs Artificial Intelligence Assisted Radiological Diagnoses for Patient Care

Supriya Nair, S. Shah, Parth Patel, Armia George, Ilfa Fida Puzhakkal, Vidhi Adya, Arsene Koumbem, Drishya Kanhangad
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into radiology has shown promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency, yet the confidence of doctors in AI-assisted diagnosis remains uncertain. AI's potential to streamline workflows and detect complex abnormalities is widely acknowledged, but skepticism persists regarding its reliability and the potential disruption of traditional radiological practices. This study aims to assess global doctors' confidence in AI-assisted radiology and explore factors influencing their acceptance of AI technologies. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional survey involved 384 doctors from diverse clinical settings worldwide. A self-administered questionnaire captured demographic data, confidence in AI versus conventional radiology, and perceptions of AI in clinical practice. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: The majority of participants (66.7%) expressed higher confidence in conventional radiologist-led diagnoses compared to AI-assisted interpretations. Confidence in AI tools averaged 5.35/10, with limited AI training (16.9%) and lack of trust (13%) as the primary challenges. Participants with more experience reported greater confidence in interpreting radiographs independently and relied less on radiologists. Common challenges in conventional radiology included delays (35%) and limited access to radiologists (26%). AI was seen as beneficial for routine cases but not yet trusted for complex diagnoses, with only 36.7% believing it will eventually surpass human expertise. Conclusion: Doctors continue to favor conventional radiologist-led diagnostics over AI-assisted tools due to concerns about trust, reliability, and insufficient training. While AI holds potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing time constraints, widespread adoption requires overcoming significant barriers. Radiologists remain crucial in clinical decision-making, and AI will likely serve as a supplementary tool until confidence in its capabilities improves.

Journal of Emergency Medicine Open AccessVol. 2(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.